Rowshan, I gotta side with these guys. If all you're going to do is make a "call" on this Rowshan report that the market will open lower after looking at the stock futures, how is that any different from me pulling up the futures on bloomberg?
Ivan, you seem to be a great guy, trying to do a good job. You just edited my last post which in no way should have gotten the knife. This piker has been acting like a jackass in my thread and deserves what he gets. And I'm starting to think he needs to be banned from ET altogether. But not for those reasons, but because he's a bad luck schlepprock who just jinxed what should have been an early morning dive. The minute he posted a genius lower opening forecast the futures took off and went all the way positive. For the sake of the worldwide financial system lets lynch this bastard. Josee Rennick Wales out
Rennick, I edit out only the personal attacks. And I'll do it again, mate. Sorry, but there's no need to attack someone with name calling constantly and offer nothing else of value. Your first paragraph was slamming his call - and rightfully so (though the last part is only my personal opinion). But attacking him personally doesn't get us anywhere but into a flame war. Also, I've not seen him in your thread for a long time now (I'll go look again now).
Sir this was yesterdays call: Can bloomberg tell you that the oils and oil stocks were going to drop? Please sir, this thread has alot of specifics, just as you asked. i have YET to see any specific post by rendick. Please be fair.
You are missing my point. Let him or anyone else post away. The Wild West is better than a library setting. Put away the edit knife and pull out your six shooters. That public spat with you and the big Mod was gold. Yosemite Rennick out
Oh, I got your point just fine, Tex. You're missing my point, it would seem. Until this: http://www.elitetrader.com/conduct_rules.cfm changes, I will continue to moderate in a manner that best supports that TOU. And you're guilty of all sorts of violations in that agreement, which I'm going to edit when I see. It's nothing personal. I actually get a good laugh from a lot of what you write. Unfortunately, if it violates the TOU, it is my job to act on it.
EXAMPLE - yes, I may be wrong in that the market briefly did open lower - SO WHAT. It moved right up and was again a worthless call. But I can be wrong. Just give me a way this can be deemed of value or used to trade profitably. All Row is trying to do is pat himself on the back by showing he is "right". WR is posting for other motives. Fun, so others can profit and to show a stupid ball can keep hitting the mark!
Discrimination? I'm sorry if you are unable to grasp the difference between: "Your calls stink! You have made the worst possible call for five days running! How can you possibly say you are correct when ..." and "Hey dickweed, where did you learn to trade, Kmart? You're so f***ing clueless that you probably..." Either comply with the TOU, or expect enforcement of it.
Well "robbie", the thread starter gave out this SPECIFIC gem on SUNDAY: Since sunday, OIL has been the main story. it has dropped -$8 to -$9 bucks, and oil STOCKS have gotten crushed, ALL of them. Look at apa, dvn, wll, clr etc etc. ANY oil stock sold on the open monday has been a HUGE winner. Sorry that you missed them. I mentioned other times on this thread to ALWAYS pay attn when I call "down". You didn't listen apparently.