So, just to summarize, some serious multiple personality disorder trolling by the same person was going on and was stopped by admin: Quote from b.hull: Local, I have reviewed the posts you have made over the past year and found your strategies to be remarkably successful. If I am objective about this, I find that your experience has given you the conviction to formulate and execute strategies for commodity spreads prior to those strategies revealing themselves as trends. I have found TA analysis to be limiting and would appreciate your oppinion on how to further educate myself about the use of fundamentals and commodity spreads. Thanks in advance.
@ Bonehead: Are you actually posting reviews here we can find on any vendor's site? - I wish I hooked up with them sooner. - These guys changed my life. - Thank you so much for your input. - Your courses are amazing. - I am now comfortable with my trading. - Bla bla bla, bla bla, bla bla bla bla... Document live trades mr vendor, show some actual proof of succes! No after the fact trades. If your approach is profitable you would have posted live trades a long long time ago. You-are-pa-the-tic ! Why don't you just leave this thread and take your last bit of self- respect with you. For once do something smart. Shaka , Frits
It seems to be that just having someone teach you the mechanics of what Bone is offering would be worthwhile. But I assume you are one of the extremely few making a bundle on naked directional plays? I've read these boards for many years, and I haven't seen any disgruntled former students of his. So I guess he must be doing something right...
Frits, with all due respect, why are you intent on repeating the same mistakes regarding education vendors ? Why would you believe a vendor's track record, and why would you believe that you have the capacity to match it or exceed it ? If you had independently contacted four or five of Rockwell's clients, you would not have gotten ripped off. Instead, like an idiot, you take a vendor's track record and statements at face value. Buyer beware. In terms of other ET members who have done due diligence on me or have been clients, why don't you PM them or even ask an admin type like Joe if they are the same IP address as me. If you are so convinced that I am as bad as you believe, why wouldn't you do the world a great service and expose me ? In fact, why don't you PM Joe or Baron and ask them if they are aware of any ET members getting scammed or ripped off by me. Publish your findings. You are lazy and naive.
Bonehead. Why ask others for their opinion about you when I can ask you directly? I gave you another chance and yet again you fail to show actual proof of your "success"...*yaaaaawn*! Instead you change the subject again. Vendors are usually good for a laugh, but in your case it gets sad, very sad. I guess I should just give up on you. As mentioned, if you were successful you would have posted proof of that a long time ago. Good luck with your next salespitch on this forum mate! Shaka , Frits
Frits, if you had independently contacted four or five of Rockwell's clients, you would not have gotten ripped off. Lack of due diligence on your part. Bernie Madoff had audited statements, BTW. Trust, but verify.
Naka, with all due respect, you are mistaken about the personal enemies part, as proven by ET staff: Unfortunately, this has happened before - ET members with agendas engaging in subterfuge. TraderZones, Lucias, BigD - all with alterior commercial motives taking cheap shots and publishing lies and fabrications. Naka, of course I realize that you are a trader and that you are not my enemy. The same cannot be said for the other characters you cite. Most of my detractors, not including you Naka, are trolls with multiple user IDs who very much have an agenda. You will note that none of my detractors are clients or former clients. I will of course, publish my track record in the next several months in form of a private prospectus offering. I have been advised by my securities attorney NOT to publish my record as part of my private consulting business. Reason being: I have fiduciary control over my own trading and investment decisions as it relates to managing money in a limited partnership setting, but I have no control over the independent trading decisions made by my consulting clientele. So, there are legal reasons why I insist that prospective clients interview my existing clients about performance metrics.
And again another change of subject by Bonehead. And as usual he missed out on another chance to show actual proof of success in trading... *yaaaawn*!! Shaka , Frits
I will of course, publish my track record for qualified individuals and funds in the next several months in form of a private prospectus offering. I have been advised by my securities attorney NOT to publish my record as part of my private consulting business. Reason being: I have fiduciary control over my own trading and investment decisions as it relates to managing money in a limited partnership setting, but I have no control over the independent trading decisions made by my consulting clientele. So, there are legal reasons why I insist that prospective clients interview my existing clients about performance metrics. So, in a nutshell my securities attorney insisted that there not be any direct or indirect implications or representations that a client could replicate my trading performance metrics. But for managing money with power-of-attorney with respect to allocating capital under the structure of a limited investment partnership - of course.