hmmm Surf used to love using the phrase nervous Nellies. Do you have a liking for options of the portfolio enhancing digital side bet type. lol.
Some people think that this system is a covered call. No, it is not! It is similar, but is not equal.
Ok Martinghoul, just listen very carefully: I as the thread owner ask you not to post in this thread (also in no other threads of mine) anymore! Because you have nothing constructive to contribute to the thread(s) but your stupid off-topic rants. By your such destructive actions you are doing harm to the thread, and also to ET, because you are lowering the quality level of the site. To the mods: please block the user Martinghoul from this thread, because he is posting off-topic and non-constructive postings only.
I think Baron needs to move this to Chit Chat before someone tries to copy the system and loses money and complains about the claim that a trading system guarantees 180% p.a.
No, the system is mathematically sound. If someone makes a loss then he must have done something gravely wrong, or a black swan event must have happened. Test the system in a 24/7 liquid continuous market w/o any gaps and it will give the said PnL. It is up to the trader to find such an environment. The text clearly states this. It is possible to monitor the position 24/7 by using multiple exchanges around the globe where the stock gets traded, ie. emulating a near-24/7 continuous market. Investment houses and banks have such an environment by default, so they can apply the system much easier because they already have such an infrastructure. But Average Joe can have it too by using a broker like IB to access multiple exchanges around the globe. As stated clearly, it is up to the trader to apply the system in a near-24/7 continuous market.
Right, let me be serious here for a moment... What you seem to be missing here, botpro, is what someone with a modicum of brain matter should have considered by now. Specifically, ask yourself this question: why are people who have and are actually trading (unlike yourself, a "researcher") making fun of your ideas? There are two possibilities. One: you're an undiscovered genius, a "diamond in the rough", so to speak, who has managed to bless the community of dull options traders with his blinding insight. We're all so envious and jealous of your obvious gifts, that we have to resort to "non-constructive" humour. This appears to be your interpretation of the proceedings here. However, I urge you to consider the alternative. Specifically, your attempts at coming up with what you describe as a "guaranteed system" are so monumentally ludicrous, silly and misguided, they're worth little more than a chuckle from anyone who has actually been in the mkt for longer than a few months. To add insult to injury, when people actually take time and attempt to show you the obvious flaws in your reasoning, you refuse to listen (I've mentioned this in an older thread). People are making fun of you, botpro, because there is nothing more hilarious than an arrogant idiot. Now I hope this was constructive. Furthermore, do you want me to help you further? Would you like me to try and explain to you (as others have tried) why your "system" is not as you describe it? If you do not want and/or the Mods request it, I will happily stop posting on this thread.
Addendum: To be on the safe side, I as the author of the free systems make these additional statements regarding the systems: 1) The systems are the result of academic research. 2) The systems have not been tested yet in the real market. 3) Use the systems at your own risk. Test it first throughly in simulations and/or backtestings/forwardtestings.
Only in your distorted imagination... BTW, I'm sure you use 2 accounts! Because you are in my ignore list. So you should not be able to quote my posting. But you have been able! This you can do only with 2 accounts: quote in one then copy then cancel, and paste to the other login... A despicable act to use multiple accounts! Shame on you! You are again in my Ignore list.