No, it's historical data. Try to get it right. Just out of curiosity, could you define historical data for me in your own words?
And not just a little. The cockiness is amusing, as if he's the first guy having a promising backtest in history. He might have something but he'll take some heavy punches in the near future. I only wish for him to keep posting.
Spoke with him in PM a little, tried to get a point across to him. He may get it, he may not. Time will tell.
You can always depend on old fancy-pants to rain on one's parade. If what I'm doing didn't look interesting to you, you wouldn't be following the thread. I already took heavy punches in the past, I know what I'm doing. I don't need your advise. I know you have a bone to pick with me and that's okay. I also know you're wishing that I fail but I've already succeeded. This is just the stats to something that I'm already winning at!!
You're missing one of the points I tried to make in the PM. If you had truly taken heavy punches in the past, you would not have such a cocky nickname as "IAlwaysWin". Seriously. When you put your talk to the walk, we shall see. padutrader is one to have gone through the process, and he seems to be finally passing the test of real verses the Matrix. destriero is another one. I told you, the community is going to repel that aggrandizing of your trading prowess, with no proof.
I don't really need your approval and I already told you what the deal is behind the name (IAlwaysWin.) It's not my fault you guys can't think on a deeper level and figure out what that really means. And, who said I was here to put on a show you clowns?
It's a new era and I plan on being the leader. You guys haven't a clue what I'm actually working with, I build algos and it's not just me but I am the leader of this branch of the new school.