90% tax on wall street workers - how does this affect traders?

Discussion in 'Taxes and Accounting' started by chewbacca, Mar 19, 2009.

  1. Lucrum

    Lucrum

    By Ryan J. Donmoyer

    "March 20 (Bloomberg) -- The Senate plans to vote next week on steep levies on employee bonuses after the House overwhelmingly approved a 90 percent tax on bonuses at American International Group Inc. and other companies receiving bailout funds."

    Isn't Pelosi Speaker of the House?
    Isn't the House controlled by the democrats?

    Is it not possible that Pelosi herself doesn't understand the constitution?

    That's not so funny.
     
    #21     Mar 20, 2009
  2. Most of these failed institutions should have been closed or merged into others, rather than bailed out.

    Just how wildly talented to you think these revenue generators ARE at AIG? For heaven sakes, we are nearing $200 billion in taxpayer money for ONE ocmpany.

    Bonuses should be reserved for companies that make profit. And given the difficulty of getting a job, I don't think most of these un-bonused people are going to find elsewhere to go. And bonuses are about to get much harder to come by.
     
    #22     Mar 20, 2009
  3. What is "beyond stupidity" is to reward the politicians who are under the impression that govt. policy has not been responsible for the current economic calamity....This means not paying any sort of any benefit to any of them....and booting them out of office and possibly into jail time....

    The public radar should include what causes the problems....Yes or No ?

    If it has been the political side that has been responsible for 80% of the problems....

    Then how can a remedy happen ? When only 20% of the problem is addressed ?

    80% of the problems that are actually responsible get to be exempt from the causal equation ?

    This is as stupid as it gets....

    Stop the insanity !!!!!
     
    #23     Mar 20, 2009
  4. That's why they advised to pass the taxes BEFORE the AIG quarter report.
     
    #24     Mar 20, 2009
  5. I wasn't defending AIG actually. Sorry if you got that impression. Regarding AIG, a contract is a contract and the pols knew about them, without a doubt. What should have happened was a renegotiation prior to the bailout. Our friends in DC realize this and that's the reason why they are heading for cover.

    Regarding your last point, I disagree, bonuses are for members of a profitable department within a company.
     
    #25     Mar 20, 2009
  6. many wall st crooks are worried about their own bonuses. what a joke.
     
    #26     Mar 20, 2009
  7. this tax bill is just a sleight of hand diversion tactic to divert attention away from the real criminals:

    joe cassano
    jimmy cayne
    stan oneil
    hank paulson
    bob rubin
    lloyd blankstein
    chucky prince
    angelo mozzillo
    nearly all of congress
     
    #27     Mar 20, 2009
  8. chewbacca is spot on.....1000% correct.....
     
    #28     Mar 20, 2009
  9. Brandonf

    Brandonf Sponsor

    This whole entire thing is a sleight of hand diversionary tactic trying to keep our attention away from the fact that we are so broke we are now having to loan ourselves money to buy finance our own shit. How exactly does this work in the long run? The whole shit storm over the bonus is a sleight of hand to get us worked up about $165million, when we should be worked up about TRILLIONS.
    AIG has become nothing but a giant US Government money laundering machine that's being used to bail out sovereign wealth funds and big banks without them having to use TARP.
    This whole thing is a slieght of hand to divert our attention away from the fact that the Obama Administration is on track to make the Bush Administration look like a bunch of genious (and that takes something!). Where is the outrage over the numbers that GAO gave us today? $10 TRILLION dollars in debt?
    The Chinese are wising up and diversifying out of US Treasury assets. I suspect a bunch of money can be made long term by betting on hyper inflation.
    Brandon
     
    #29     Mar 20, 2009
  10. This law is like a second prescription to treat the side-effects of the first one. Pretty soon you're taking 6 pills a meal to counteract all the side effects.

    How about stop taking drugs, eat healthy and exercise.

    But that requires your dealer to admit he's part of the problem.

    [dang, talking in metaphor is tiring I dunno how Dr.Phil does it...]:cool:
     
    #30     Mar 20, 2009