warbird You can check my take on this issue by reading my posts above. However, the fact is that these people are paying customers here. They are here by invitation of the site owners. So it doesn't make much sense to ask them to leave. At least the mods didn't delete my posts, which is kind of surprising, to tell the truth. This must mean that Puretick didn't file an objection to them.
Mr. True Blue, Would you mind posting a screenshot of the backtest expressing a 90% hit rate at 1:1 or better?
Sure true blue. Shoot me a PM and I'll send you a link. p.s. trader28 aka tradetime, nmed, supergrass, & warbird. Are you 'that' bored ? Find a hobby. CajunSniper / Puretick.com Administrator-Trader
Greetings, I will send it to anyone that emails me. I dont need 10,000 people hitting it and asking me hundreds of questions but I dont mind sending it out to those who put forth the effort to email. geoff_nospam_@puretick.com CajunSniper / Puretick.com Administrator-Trader
Ummm.... huh?? You don't want 10,000 people hitting it? Why not??? You don't want thousands of people asking you questions about your service?? I thought you'd want that for sure!! I sure as hell would if I were in an advisory business! The more people asking questions, the better, right??? That is just bizarre to me. If you have proof that you have a system that generates 90% winning trades and you want to vend it, I would think that you would be trying to get 10,000 people to be aware of it!!! I said my piece about your claims, and I really didn't want to question your bona fides any more. I just wanted to see the backtesting results. But I'm sorry, this is just a very weird thing to me. It is the opposite of what I would expect you to say. (Confused)
Spectra, thanks for the link. As I suspected, it's >80% at up to 5:1 risk-reward. I appreciate you candor, but I've never met a successful futures trader who would entertain anything greater than 1:1, let alone 5:1.