No, you dumb, stinky poo dumb dumb. Seriously, never go full retard Dorito. Homan's numbers are giving you pause no doubt. So flippy burger taking the only job the majority of people on your side of the Bell curve can actually do is.....? Gonna be a lot of universal basic income Amercians? Like socialism? No, there won't be a tech fix nearly quick enough. They are just preparing to steal on an epic scale. Again... Suckers.
Hey Mercor: When there are no taxes, you won't be bothered by other people benefitting from your tax money. Result.
How much did Biden pay to import and finance 10 million illegals? Trumps new big money friends want cheap labor, legal or illegal they don't care. So when will the American worker become great again?
Show us where the $86 billion is coming from? You think just because we marvel at the exorbitant cost that you didn't google to realize trump administration came up with the number it means we want illegals running all over and sleeping in our houses? It means low level thinkers buy into the bullshit shoveled and then get upset when we lay out facts. You voted because he said he would deport.every single person he believes doesn't belong here and Kamala lost because she made no proposal on how to deal with the issue... so trump won. Now stand behind your man and explain how a party of fiscal conservatives blaming dems for spending over the budget is.going to afford $86 billion? What does.it mean? trump has no better an idea or plan to solve this issue than Kamala did he just was a better bullshitter. Also don't act.like.every single illegal showed up only over the past 4 years...they been coming non stop since Bush and Clinton and congress just bickers.
Homan said on Fox News that the $86 billion is most likely an underestimate number...I believe him. I've lived as a civilian and served in the U.S. military in the country with the best border security in the world. South Korea border security shared with North Korea...the Korean Peninsula. They're successful because the DMZ is heavily militarized on both sides (not one sided) along +150 miles of border. Further, the Peninsula helps with their security along with the fact that one country is heavily militarized and requires a large portion of its population to serve in the military... In contrast, the +1,951 miles U.S.-Mexico border is the busiest in the world. Each year the our southern border allows in more than 300 million people, approximately 90 million cars, and 4.3 million truck crossings. Mandatory military service at a young age (typically 17 - 18 years old for conscription) is common with other other countries too that have stronger border security than the United States. Another commonality with these types of countries that have stronger border security than the United States...they only give exemptions from military obligations to athletes that have won medals in international competition (e.g. World championship, Olympic games, Jr. Worlds, European Championships, Asian Championships). In addition, the military in those countries has extensive access to University records of enrolled students to ensure those students have fulfilled their military obligation. The best a student can do is delay their entry if they're accepted into a degree program. Another commonality, those countries have stricter rules involving gun ownership and freedom of rights...a huge reason why the United States has difficulty securing its southern border for many Presidential administrations going back to the early 2000s because we relied too heavily on the "private sector" to manage immigration/migration. In contrast, countries with stronger border security than the United States rely heavily on their military. It's why countries like South Korea and Israel rely heavily on the U.S. military or help from our United States Department of Defense to secure their borders. Simply, if we want the same stronger border security as those countries...we need to change our laws involving military service, which students in college not accepted in their degree departments, gun ownership, loss of freedoms et cetera...something most Americans will fight to the death not to give up. A little sarcasm below... Imagine a new law that requires any American citizen between 18 to 40 years of age applying for a gun license, conceal weapons permit must have served in the U.S. military for a minimum of 4 years along the Southern border to help secure that border. Oh I hear the uproar right now and all the pending lawsuits. Those not physically fit to serve...they're required mandatory military service in administration work along the Southern border to free up those physically able to serve on the new U.S. militarized zone in the South. If the above was the law of the land back when Trump was young...he would have served in the military on active duty in "administration capacity" because he would not have qualified for physical military work along the Southern border because of his bone spurs. Simply, those that voted for a stronger Southern border should be willing to give up some of their rights as an American citizen by serving in the military along the Southern border for our country especially when we keep labeling "immigration" as a National Crisis or National Security Concern. wrbtrader
One.easy way to clean up is simply draw a date line in the sand from lets say a year ago and say anyone here before that date can file paperwork to become a resident, get legal working papers and pay taxes but never citizenship if never convicted of a crime. This could bring millions out of the dark and into a tax paying situation and legal status. Those who don't after a certain time perhaps a year can be deported. Now instead of deporting 10 million people you create 8 to 9 million taxpayers possibly.and clean up a lot of mess. Then we need a new regime of immigration laws. If you cross the Southern Border into U.S. you can never be allowed to stay. Period. Spend money on consulate and embassies for people to apply for asylum before entry. I also believe DACA or dreamers shouldn't be deported or their parents. It is more beneficial to become residents and in the open then removing working contributing people. They came and neither Obama, Trump or Congress did anything concrete. A solution that makes people already here contributing jave a legal status is more beneficial than trying to kick them out (excluding felons). There is no easy fix but rather than gop always taking the pussy way out and blaming dems (even when they were in power) and dems afraid to offend any immigrant....just close the country except to those with visas or legal asylum petitions. Whole approach might cost $1 billion...
I prefer the militarized zone solution of our southern border but only because we have successful examples (e.g. South Korea and Israel) in other countries that use the U.S. military to make their border security the best in the world. Further, we already have an existing solution of rotating our troops back n forth from those countries to the United States. It develops a strong bond between the U.S. military and their military (e.g. ROK Special Forces Brigades in South Korea and the elite units of the IDF in Israel). That's a lot of experience we can quickly deploy to the Southern border to militarize it before we need to use mandatory military conscription of our registered gun owners and anyone older than 18 years of age who has not served their country (the latter called the draft)... It makes sense if we keep viewing immigration as National Crisis or National Security Concern...similar to countries with a militarized zone for their border security. wrbtrader
1.5 million illegals with criminal records. Start there, It will take a couple of years Cost will be far less then 86 billion It might be a net gain since half of these people are in jails. The Progressives believe in emptying the prisons anyway