As stated, for up-to-date data that breaks the statistics down to different groups (e.g. age, ethnicity, type of vaccine, co-morbidity, etc) since the first date of vaccination... It's only available to hospitals and public health agencies of each state. I've seen the data for the following states: Illinois, Kentucky, South Dakota...data for each month. It's only because I have relatives that work in the hospital administration in those states and are Doctors. Regardless, stupid argument because there are too many wannabe scientists that have never worked in a research laboratory, who don't understand why/why not certain statistical data are maintained nor hold a degree in anything that studies infectious diseases. wrbtrader
Let's walk through the reality about infections once again. Seeing that the current estimated number of infections in western countries is 2 to 3 estimated infections to each detected case. It may be possible that the percentage of of estimated vaccinated but unproven breakthrough "infections" to be as high as 2% (0.5% proven and 1.5% (3 for 1) estimated) in an environment where the virus is highly prevalent. However it should be noted this is the worse case scenario. I will still note this estimated worse case Covid breakthrough "infection rate" of 2% is still below the proven vaccinated breakthrough case rate of over 3% for measles, mumps, and most other diseases in a population where the disease is highly prevalent. Seeing that the 0.5% breakthrough rate is worse case in the data and most states are showing rates below 0.2% -- it is more likely that the estimated breakthrough total "infections" is below 0.8% in an environment where Covid is highly prevalent.
do the 81 studies include those that died from covid? Costs to treat? Natural immunity to polio is great also, so we should skip the polio vaccine" Rubella? You are such moron.
I don't understand binary arguments on a trading forum. People die from crashes on highways, should we close down highways? Should we not report and demand accurate statistics so we can have debate about speed limits, airbags or seat belts. Public health is very important. If we can not compare the efficacy of vaccination vs natural infection with accurate statistics we are living in a very strange world, which will be doomed to making poor overall decisions for society. Why do so many want to just shut down access to proper information and discussion? You should read some of the studies, some were very good with very large databases. Others were not as useful. I have not read all of them.
You are not pushing accurate information or discussion. You are pushing pure anti-vax Covid-denier misinformation. Tens of thousands of people across the globe are dying due to anti-vax Covid misinformation. The nonsense you regularly push is causing these deaths. Have you no shame? Or any decency?
As a practical and logical matter, all manner of treatment should be allowed. Take Ivermectin, extreme liberal media and hacks continue to say this is only for animals. Not true. There are two kinds of Ivermectin which they do not mention. One for animals and one for humans. The one for humans is in tablet form and a prescription written by a board certified doctor. Ivermectin is an FDA approved drug, just not for Corona Virus. However, multiple studies have been conducted the world over by board certified doctors and experts as to its safety and ability to cure Corona Virus. They do not talk about the fact, Ivermectin tablets cost $0.06 each while, Remdesivir costs $1,200 a dose. What about the vaccines, how much do they cost per dose? People have died needlessly by being intubated and given treatments that do close to nothing to cure the Corona Virus. Such is the stupidity of it all. Yet, we are to believe vaccines alone will save you? Remember these are still experimental drugs on emergency use authorization. Their adverse effects and deaths statistics would not be available till October 2022 for Moderna. Yet, they say it is safe.
LOL -- Ivermectin costs $0.06 per dose. Why don't we take a look once again at the patent and pricing information for Ivermectin. As noted in drug patent watch, Ivermectin’s original U.S. patent may have expired in 1996 but there are 12 additional U.S follow-up patents for Ivermectin plus 102 foreign patents. Most companies (in fact all) producing genetics for Ivermectin simply find it best to navigate this patent maze by manufacturing under license agreement with Merck. This allows support from Merck while alleviating all possible patent entanglements. Of course Merck makes money off of these agreements. There are 10 suppliers of Ivermectin listed worldwide. According to drug patent watch -- the pricing information for Ivermectin is about $4 per unit. Tags: COVIDIVERMECTIN
Let us walk through the reality of science and data. Neither you nor anyone else has a established .5% breakthrough rate. Show us a database of fully vaccinated people and track them for 9 months with periodic testing. A booster would of course reset the clock. We will compare that to the best studies we have and see if we can glean any useful information.
The 0.5% Covid vaccinated case breakthrough rate is firmly established as the worst case. With data from the U.S., U.K. Canada, and Europe all supporting this figure. Of course this figure can go up with Omicron which appears to be more vaccine evasive. Time will tell.