81 Research Studies Confirm Natural Immunity to COVID ‘Equal’ or ‘Superior’

Discussion in 'Politics' started by exlib, Dec 8, 2021.

  1. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Maybe you need to go read the CDC warning on the VAERS home page -- the one which states clearly the VAERS database does not prove any medical linkage between the vaccination and adverse events.
     
    #21     Dec 8, 2021
  2. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    Once again - If your sources have their posts flagged by fact checkers on Twitter, LinkedIn, Facebook, YouTube and other platforms as being FALSE INFORMATION. And their accounts are regularly being removed for promoting conspiracy nonsense --- then these sources should be discredited for being complete junk. There is no reason to debate complete nonsense that comes from conspiracy nutcases on FB, Twitter, Youtube, and blogs including crap from Alex Jones and other fringe clowns. It is time for you and others to get your information from reliable mainstream sources if you want to have a discussion. We are not going to debunk post after post saying "prove this wrong" as you put forward the latest conspiracy crap floating around the internet sourced by disputable websites and individuals.
     
    #22     Dec 8, 2021
  3. easymon1

    easymon1

    You are quite the Deflection Disinformation Troll, lol.
    Stick to the topic.
    Where's the data to support YOUR claim gwb?
    Lets start with an easy one -
    C) Do the jabs Prevent Covid-19 gwb?

    Then there's this too, lol - Have you actually debunked this with opposing study data: Man you are useless, lol.
    "81 Research Studies Confirm Natural Immunity to COVID ‘Equal’ or ‘Superior’"
    Seems like we saw a lot of articles that you should actually have your mommy read to you in order to expose your mushy mind to a spectrum of views on the topic. That idea is foreign to you is it not, my silly vengeful friend.

    In summary:
    gwb claims: " Ivermectin is useless for 1)preventing or 2)treating Covid-19"
    A) You got data to back that up? Otherwise how are we to separate you from disinformation tools gwb?
    B) Specifically, "Treating Covid-19" is of interest.
    Prevention is a separate issue gwb.
    C) Do the jabs Prevent Covid-19 gwb?
    D) How effective are the jabs at preventing Covid-19?
    E) Which manufacturers jabs are the Most effective and which are the Least effective?
    F) What are the side effects related to each manufacturers jabs?
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2021
    #23     Dec 8, 2021
  4. exGOPer

    exGOPer


    It prevents hospitalizations and death which is common among red counties


    How many have you read? I read the first one, it says those who had covid and SURVIVED, means sponsorship bias - dead people whose natural immunity didn't work are not counted.

    Because there are multiple studies that prove they haven't worked AND all those MAGGots taking them are dying by the hundreds.

    Why aren't you maggots interested in side effects of Covid? Compared to covid, side effects of jabs are miniscule.
     
    #24     Dec 8, 2021
  5. easymon1

    easymon1

    You got Data to back your claims up? Are you allergic to scientific studies same as gwb? Are you two birds of a feather?
    Just More Deflection
    from the questions below.

    Let your DATA DO THE TALKING, lol.

    A) You got data to back that up? Otherwise how are we to separate you from disinformation tools gwb?
    B) Specifically, "Treating Covid-19" is of interest.Where are your studies proving that ivermectin fails at treating covid-19?
    Prevention is a separate issue gwb.
    C) Do the jabs Prevent Covid-19 gwb?
    D) How effective are the jabs at preventing Covid-19?
    E) Which manufacturers jabs are the Most effective and which are the Least effective?
    F) What are the side effects related to each manufacturers jabs?

    As for You:
    We'll start here, "It prevents hospitalizations and death which is common among red counties"

    You can surely find a study for that. Let's see it. Get the ball rolling.
    We'll wait.
     
    #25     Dec 8, 2021
  6. gwb-trading

    gwb-trading

    This is typical anti-vax Covid-denier tactics -- demand all sorts of information which has been provided before over and over and over again. When you do provide the information from proper mainstream sources he never reads it and simply reverts to tossing out further CRUD.
     
    #26     Dec 8, 2021
  7. easymon1

    easymon1

    More slander.
    More name calling.
    More Deflection.
    Nothing Specific.
    Empty Paper Bag gwb.
    Pathetic.
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2021
    #27     Dec 8, 2021
  8. exlib

    exlib

    So if Omicron is mild and you are healthy would you take a 3rd does of Pfizer?

    Hopeful side though, if Omicron is mild and all the high risk get a 3rd does (per the news that a 3rd does works) maybe this time can we can get close to 100 percent hybrid immunity.
     
    Last edited: Dec 8, 2021
    #28     Dec 8, 2021
  9. exGOPer

    exGOPer

    You morons have been saying since the pandemic started.

    The very first of your '81' studies ignores everyone who was dead from covid, so how does that prove natural immunity is better?
     
    #29     Dec 8, 2021
  10. easymon1

    easymon1