That is a fair response. If I thought we could deny the virus hosts I would be more inclined to agree with mandatory vaccination for adults. But, unfortunately vaccination antibodies are only temporary and there will always be vulnerable high risks hosts for the virus. (given current technology) I think mandatory exercise outdoors and diet restrictions for able bodied high risk would be far more effective in the long run. Where is Bloomberg outlawing soda when you need him.
Your arguments can only be made logically on the basis of statistics. You have ignored the several outcomes other than death. and you have ignored the threat posed by evolution of the virus. Neither the statistics nor evolutionary considerations support your arguments.
The data, studies, and facts demonstrate clearly the unvaccinated are variant factories accounting for 99% or more of the Covid variants.
Don't forget that if we can get a sufficient fraction of the world's population vaccinated, the Virus itself will be temporary! The vaccines only have to be effective as long as the virus can find a sufficient number of hosts to survive.
I think you misunderstand evolutionary considerations if you think temporary vaccinations during a pandemic is a good thing for society overall. But, I welcome a good debate. I am in favor of vaccinations for the high risk, but not because of science but humanity.
The Narrative™ supports this. There is data on the other side, but of course it is suppressed in the name of sCIenCE.
So yes or no on the Measles and Shingles? Does your Measles shot protect you from unvaccinated measles patients? Can't answer it, can ya.
There is an entire thread on this subject dedicated to bringing you the facts and data from reliable mainstream sources. Go read it.