The other thing I forgot to mention is that the human male is genetically programmed to procreate in order to ensure the survival of his gene pool. In order to do this, the male must present himself as being desirable to females. When in the presence of a superior male, an inferior male must seek different means to ensure his ability to procreate. As an example, when an inferior male sees a male who has a superior physique and intellect, the inferior male quickly try to negate or discount the attractive characteristics of the superior male. Comments such , "He has big muscles but must have a small penis." or "an MBA from a great school is meaningless" are feeble attempts by the inferior male to try in vain to do anything to somehow maintain the survival of his gene pool lest he be outcompeted. I don't harbor any ill will towards anyone on this board, it's just another display of Darwinism at work.
"When in the presence of a superior male, an inferior male must seek different means to ensure his ability to procreate." Ok Mr. Market....You are officially starting to worry me....Have you seen the pictures you have on your own board? Don't take this the wrong way, but your FUGLEY...You really didn't have a choice, you had to lift weights and get at least somewhat built because truthfully, If my dog looked like you, I d shave his ass and make him walk backwards!....You need a dose of reality you know that? Im huge? Im superior? Get a grip buddy...you keep talking about gene pool but which gene pool were you created from? i would have been your father but the dog beat me over the fence!....that explains the hair though!....
This is a much better example of what I was alluding to...good thing I don't shave my body or some people would run out of ways to try to reposition themselves when faced with a superior male.
"This is a much better example of what I was alluding to...good thing I don't shave my body or some people would run out of ways to try to reposition themselves when faced with a superior male." Just shut up and bark ok
hello sir, I was just wondering. I haven't seen your website, but I must admit that not acknowledging all your losing trades is not the way to calculate a portfolio. You're suppose to mark all your positions to the market. That's what all the big brokerage houses do. Can you tell me your returns if you marked all your losing trades to the market, rather than ignoring them with repsect to your track record. And dont you think ignoring losing trades is somewhat misrepresentative of your true performance? Vinny ps I believe you are huge. sounds good to me. I'm impressed.
I am not ignoring any of my losing trades. I publicly list all of my postitions and have been doing do for the last 10 years. Take a look: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mrmarketishuge/ I'm not sure why you would jump to such conclusions without first doing a little due diligence.
.... stretches.... notes yet another crap continuation of this crap thread... unsubscribes.... *yawn*
you obviously are ignoring the losers. I dont need more DD to figure that out. It's statistically impossible to have 53 consecutive winning trades. you are huge. huge BS.