They dont prove obstruction and you and your ilk use those cases in a lame attempt to show that Mueller has all sorts of proof and cases of Trump obstruction or criminial conspiracy. They are an attempt to compensate for not being able to prove obstruction. Mueller is just witch hunting around DC now trying to find some stuff on Trump to get him impeached, even though he can't get him on the obstruction charge. We know you are fine with that. And based on how the evidence was obtained in most of Mueller's cases, through phoney fisa warrants, fbi rigging and collusion with russian and british agents, etc. I would be fine with seeing the court toss most of them. We know you want more of it.
Meeting with Russians isn't collusion. If it was several democrats would be guilty too, as would people form both parties for decades past. Yeah, I know, when democrats meet with Russian officials it's called diplomacy. Sell your bullshit to someone else, and lucky for you there are plenty of buyers.
Meeting with Russians for the candidacy and not in an official capacity, then denying any knowledge of such meetings is a little different.
If Democrats were having these kind of meetings they too should be investigated and prosecuted just like Trump.If not sell your false equivalence bullshit to someone else,and lucky for you there are plenty of dumb ass republican buyers. https://www.elitetrader.com/et/threads/another-steele-dossier-claim-proven-right.320228/ “The Justice Department special counsel has evidence that Donald Trump’s personal lawyer and confidant, Michael Cohen, secretly made a late-summer trip to Prague during the 2016 presidential campaign,” McClatchyreports. “Confirmation of the trip would lend credence to a retired British spy’s report that Cohen strategized there with a powerful Kremlin figure about Russian meddling in the U.S. election.” “It would also be one of the most significant developments thus far in Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation of whether the Trump campaign and the Kremlin worked together to help Trump win the White House. Undercutting Trump’s repeated pronouncements that “there is no evidence of collusion,” it also could ratchet up the stakes if the president tries, as he has intimated he might for months, to order Mueller’s firing.”
Sa No, if Republicans developed opposition research on Camp Hillary and gave it to the FBI- and then they did not corroborate it- but used it in a FISA warrant application- the case against the dems should be dismissed or at least any finding flowing from the warrant suppressed. Even if- and the word is "if"- elements of the dossier/warrant later prove to be true that does not tidy up the warrant. You can't use a warrant to go out and get probable cause for the warrant. That dog don't hunt. And just accepting opposition research from a political opponent- without corroborating it- as the basis of seeking a warrant is legally ugly beyond belief.