If someone like you thinks I'm a clueless, it is a good thing. I'm quite confident that those reading both sides of this argument understand who the idiot really is. I did, however, just notice your low post count (and most of your posts are in this thread). Who were you before today? What was your previous sock puppet?
He's not an idiot, but very dense indeed, willful ignorance is a more accurate term. Like most of the righties on here he is blinded by his faux beliefs and the DNA make up that makes those people natural followers.
So do you also believe that it is harder to fake a signature than to fake a government issued ID card?
I assure you, if you submit to me your name and address, I can have a driver's license produced with Tom Hill's image on it that will fool the police in your state, even if they swipe it to check the magentic code!. However, if Tom Hill were to show up at your voting district on election day, announce himself as you, were he to have to sign into a ledger, he would fail at his effort to impersonate you and steal your vote. He would not be able to reproduce your scrawl. But I would never ask Tom to stoop to such ignominy as pretending to be you.
Even if what you say were true, and I don't possess the knowledge of such illegal activities to argue either way, it is still easier for me to fake a signature than to go through the process of making a fake identification card (which I suspect would still not pass the scrutiny of a police officer, but again, I cannot argue with complete certainty). I noticed you avoided my pseudonym question, though. Which username were you before you made the new one today?
My guess is that it's easier to fake a signature. I don't know much about the process for faking signatures or ID's so my guess could be wrong.
Yeah, same here. So why are you taking his side on the quote that faking an ID is easier?? And then throwing an insult my way when you claim the same as me? Sheesh.
I refer to the two counterfeit activities in the context of this thread, voter impersonation, and practical considerations in voter impersonation. 30,000 dead people on the voter rolls in North Carolina. Suppose a wicked political operative wishes to sway a election and get 200 paid hacks to vote in the place of 200 - or more - dead people, who, I am sure we both agree, would not show up at the polls. They are given fake IDs with the names and addresses of the people whom they are impersonating. They show thier IDs to the poll worker, and he sends them into the voting station. However, if he asks them to sign a register and compares thier signatures to the original on file, they can't fake a signature on the fly. Unless they are unusually talented. When I vote, I have to sign the register. At the top of the register is part my original voter registration card with my signature. The poll worker verifies my signature. I can go down to lower Manhattan and buy a fake driver's license for $75. For $175, I can get one that will fool the local police. But I cannot look at a signature and in the next second replicate it with a smidgeon of fidelity. So, once again. I support voter verification. But if that 98 year nun without current ID and Jemima Jackson without current ID can sign the register and satisfy the poll worker, that should suffice. Grandfather current voters and require ID for voters who have yet to vote at all. Problem solved, except the problem really isn't voter fraud. Its voting Democratic. The next profiling issue to hit the Red states. VWD, voting while Democrat. Driving to the polls as a registered Democrat will get you pulled over on election day. You bums should be licking Katherine Harris' pussy and canonizing her. My prior handle? Yanjing. Before that, it was Huarun.