3 "juveniles" kill man because they "were bored"

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Clubber Lang, Aug 20, 2013.

  1. Mercor

    Mercor

    I like your math.
    Lets go ahead and give credit to the Republicans for voting in the Civil Rights Act of 1964

    Democratic Party: (63–37%)
    Republican Party: (80–20%)
     
    #41     Aug 20, 2013
  2. Ricter

    Ricter

    If only non-"white" people had been allowed to vote romney would have lost in a landslide.
     
    #42     Aug 20, 2013
  3. Max E.

    Max E.

    And what would the result have been if ONLY WHITE people were allowed to vote?
     
    #43     Aug 20, 2013
  4. Ricter

    Ricter

    Who cares, you lost. That's the main thing.
     
    #44     Aug 20, 2013
  5. Max E.

    Max E.

    The country lost, bottom line is you are a coward with extremely shoddy math skills, you actually tried earlier to make the claim that white people elected obama, when there was a 12 point spread against him.

    Like all left wing drones, you rely heavily on dishonesty to win arguments, because no one in their right mind would buy the bullshit you are selling if you were honest.
     
    #45     Aug 20, 2013
  6. I give you credit for having the patience to STILL try and engage the idiot in a debate. Not only does he divert the conversation repeatedly, but by the end of it, he simply reverts back to some bullshit taunt, per his usual m.o.

    He is a complete scumbag.
     
    #46     Aug 20, 2013
  7. DHOHHI

    DHOHHI

    Yeah but non-white people (1) overall have lesser education (2) have lessor income (3) depend MORE on government assistance (4) commit more crime based on their percentage of the overall US population. FACTS: deal with them!!

    Bottom line ... the non-white population are inferior intellectually and live for handouts overall. And the way they reproduce they will soon be the majority. At the same time .... many whites who have voted Democratic will soon "wake up" and see that they are being ripped off by the losers in society who want something for nothing. Cutting off 50% of public assistance would be a first step. Then maybe these lazy people would get off their fat asses and look for a job. But as long as Obama has programs that make it more profitable to live off taxpayers rather than work we'll see more of this crap.
     
    #47     Aug 20, 2013
  8. Ricter

    Ricter

    Not like it would have with romney. Close call.

    Didn't read the rest of your nonsense, you're affected today.
     
    #48     Aug 20, 2013
  9. DHOHHI

    DHOHHI

    The county is heading for BANKRUPTCY idiot. Do you have even a GED? Wanna debate this in an intellectual manner? How do you defend your buddies who live off of handouts? You condone that lifestyle? If so, I suspect you too are "one of them". Meanwhile, I and others, pay for your "welfare".
     
    #49     Aug 20, 2013
  10. Ricter

    Ricter

    Lol, Obama's programs. Made law decades ago. You're a dunce.
     
    #50     Aug 20, 2013