No. Again, red duke did not make the assertion about the money, who works for gas companies and impeachment. The fact based onus is not on him. To a larger point this is how Trump got elected and Fox News is a thing, right wing base voters do not check the veracity of the claims they promulgate.
I don't care about onus shmonus. You said it was not possible to prove a negative in this case. Not impossible or probably not even hard even you have different references. Any reference cited in support of his claim will be dismissed as inaccurate or partisan. That's how you guys roll.
Fine then if you want to be Don Quixote then you produce the evidence for the assertion until then it should be treated as baseless.
Cozy little arrangement the dems have with the swamp spies. Adam Schiff has 2 aides who worked with whistleblower at White House https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/...-who-worked-with-whistleblower-at-white-house