Those pics look like the lighting/lens was chosen to make the image as ugly as possible, and/or the girls have been awake for 50 hours straight and got smacked around a bit for good measure... far left column 3rd down from the top, wtf? Looks like an alien, or it was taken with a fisheye lens.
Victoria's Secret do use them. These models look so different without make up that it is difficult to recognize them. Do you recognize Alessandria Ambrosia in the picture?
There are at least 5 of these models that are also Victoria's secrets': Laeticia Casta, Emily DiDonato, Adriana Lima, Noemie Lenoir and Alessandra Ambrosio. I guess they are not only "without make up" for this ad. They are IMO "make-up uglied" and perhaps photoshopped. Vuitton has always been for old people with bad taste.
First column third row has been raised near Tchernobyl for sure and I wouldn't touch fourth column second row and her XXL eyebrows with a pole...
I don't really know the names for the most part. I recognize faces, and other things, but not the names. The big name ones, as you hear about them too often, but not the others. I have to say they had to of uglied(new word) them up. I see the wife without makeup, and while there is an obvious difference, she doesn't scare me without makeup like these ladies. lol
There are two very attractive ladies on my floor in my apt. building. Attractive while going out or to work, that is. First thing in the morning going for a run or walking the dog and it's OMFG, who the #$@&^ are you? I would not have recognized them had I not known where they lived. Modern makeup is absolutely amazing stuff.
A number of the women in the photos are very good looking. Some of them are not. The photography is less than flattering, and apparently intentionally so. DMV?
Bullshit. It's actually a really bad libtard photoshopping of her official pic: <img src=http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/attachment.php?s=&postid=2820337>