Good summary. You might have given credit to Alex Elder. I'm currently on 1.5% account capital risk per trade. I have been as high as 5% in special situations. I hope to one day be making enough money sufficiently consistently that I can (safely) escape the tyranny of the 2% rule.
Conclusion The 2% rule, or any x% rule of this sort, applies to frequent trading at low cost where the effect of a reduction in expectation due to position sizing is counterbalanced by an increase in frequency of trades. The 2% (or X%) rule can be used with Medium frequency trading (scalping, intraday, short-term) Strategies with well-defined stop-loss levels Multiple open positions in different markets (portfolio heat control) The 2% (or X%) rule cannot be used with Most mean-reversion strategies Medium to longer-term trend-following Strategies that do not use stop-loss Alternative schemes for controlling risk when the rule does not apply must be used as mentioned above including but not limited to varying the strategy allocation accordingly.
%% Easy to beat 2%, by keeping some capital in a local bank. As far as one trade goes ; IBD guideline of risk 7or 8 % max to make 24% makes much more sense.[NOT a prediction + that's for one trade/risking 2% for the stuff[one trade] i trade /invest in would be a waste time+ money.....................................................................................................] [And leverage stuff is much different from cash markets/not just a matter of math adjustments/edit]
It’s all got to do with the risk appetite you got, some people can be more daring if they have a large capital to play around with.
IBD used to advocate 7-8% stop loss. 2% is too much for me for what I get into. I prefer something along the lines of a volatility based stop as described in turtle based crap. https://www.tradingsetupsreview.com/ultimate-guide-volatility-stop-losses/ https://www.investopedia.com/articles/trading/09/volatility-stops.asp Go read the turtle books for more. I think VanTharp might go into this a bit. I don't understand or use Kelly Criterion but think my post and the post that talks about it are the only posts worth paying attention to here.