if you even had half a brain... and were not a troll you would know that is what the elector plaintiff in Georgia is doing. this is the first time any court is reviewing the facts and evidence. If instead of this being the first time, you were right (for the first time in your troll life on this issue) and this issue had been tried... Obama's team could argue res judicata or at least ask the court to take judicial notice of other rulings or other findings by election officials. The court would then consider that argument. This is justice in action... as a non commie american, you should welcome a court making sure the constitution is followed. Besides you said Obama can prove he is eligible under the law. so, this should be easy sailing for him... right? No proof issues, no NBC issues... because all those birthers did not know what you know. You and the press were magically informed by faith that Obama can prove he was born here and that NBC only requires being born here... Right... isn't that true. This should be easy for Obama and his team. As easy as if I go down to my election board and sign up.
not one case reviewed evidence. Those were procedural dismissals. Supreme court said what exactly about Obama being eligible. I saw a supreme court justice, address this on tv on this subject... you are completely full of shit on that. you do not understand jurisprudence. This is the first case which looks like some evidence will be reviewed.
yeah exactly.... because it's about OBAMA - not about eligibility per se, otherwise plenty other Presidents would have had an eligbility question raised. You blew it right there.
..now you've changed subject! "that is what the elector plaintiff in Georgia is doing." look ...you just said it yourself. It's why there is no reason to change the law on eligibility. It can be taken to court. Eligibility is no more than birther's smokescreen
http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/09-6790.htm like I said you do not understand the law. petition for cert - denied... that is a procedural move by the court to not hear a case. In supreme court jurisprudence that means you may not make any findings or conclusions based on a denied petition.
you keep saying the law has been applied and now they are trying to change it. the point of this suit is that the eligibility law has not yet been applied or met. the elector is asking the court to apply the law if the candidate is eligible he will be put on the primary ballot. It only looks like a smokescreen to low comprehension brains and trolls.
no ... you said case dismissed as if the case had been tried and a court found in favor of obama... here was your quote... just before that. "When over 80 court decisions includeing some of them being US Supreme Court decisions say this is nonsense and that orly tatz is a nut I tend to agree with them -- If you agree no decision has yet been made on the facts of obama eligibility ... then I withdraw my correction.