2 black thugs kill hard working white man —hate crime

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Innervoice, Oct 4, 2022.

  1. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark


    And not the actual death and crime by guns.Got it.
     
    #61     Oct 5, 2022
  2. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark


    Exactly as I stated the factual interpretation of it. And that's what makes me an honest actor.
     
    #62     Oct 5, 2022
  3. Good1

    Good1

    The Democrat party is successfully pandering to the greens, and will be the only party in November, pandering to greens, with a chance to win. But maybe you will find a gen z here who will help you split the vote.

    I hope more people like you will trade the markets.
     
    #63     Oct 5, 2022
  4. Good1

    Good1

    That's why you would be better served to join one of the outlet arms for party propaganda. The Democrats need more actors who actually believe the bullshit.
     
    #64     Oct 5, 2022
  5. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark

    You just can't stay on topic.Again, typical when losing an argument.
     
    #65     Oct 5, 2022
  6. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark


    You would be better served learning to debate topics at hand.This thread is not about Trevor Noah,CNN plus,trading or your opinion of what I should be doing.
     
    #66     Oct 5, 2022
  7. Good1

    Good1

    It's about the ramifications of rhetoric and propaganda.

    Gun policy is a Democrat party policy, not a Green Party plank. So you are throwing your weight for the Democrats to waste to in November.

    We need more people who will split their vote, assured your embellished ignorant interpretation of a popular Republican position is some kind of truth bomb. As Trump would say, 'Very dishonest.'
     
    #67     Oct 5, 2022
  8. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark

    Ignorance at its finest

    upload_2022-10-5_1-22-21.png



    upload_2022-10-5_1-24-17.png



    upload_2022-10-5_1-25-22.png
     
    #68     Oct 5, 2022
  9. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark


    upload_2022-10-5_1-26-31.png
     
    #69     Oct 5, 2022
  10. Good1

    Good1

    That's looks like psychological projection for the 30,000 times the outlets for the propaganda arms of the Democrat party smeared Trump in hopes his defamation would get back political power for themselves.

    Where did you read the contents of the Trump vs. CNN case brief? It's going to come down to whether someone's celebrity truly exempts what would clearly be defamation in any other situation. Not once or twice, but rather a smear campaign maintained for multiple years over numerous incidents, with malice, with my intent to harm.
     
    #70     Oct 5, 2022