Yes no one except virtually the entire science community of the world. Except for them hardly anyone. How does one become so stupid as you are? Did you work at it? Do you have a degree in moronity?
Of course you think that. Jerm is a crazed lying idologue who is completely wrong about AGW and many other things. You are just a moron. The scientific opinion on climate change is that the Earth's climate system is unequivocally warming, and it is extremely likely (at least 95% probability) that humans are causing most of it through activities that increase concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, such as deforestation and burning fossil fuels. In addition, it is likely that some potential further greenhouse gas warming has been offset by increased aerosols.[1][2][3][4] This scientific consensus is expressed in synthesis reports, by scientific bodies of national or international standing, and by surveys of opinion among climate scientists. Individual scientists, universities, and laboratories contribute to the overall scientific opinion via their peer-reviewed publications, and the areas of collective agreement and relative certainty are summarised in these high level reports and surveys. National and international science academies and scientific societies have assessed current scientific opinion on climate change. These assessments are generally consistent with the conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report summarized: Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, as evidenced by increases in global average air and ocean temperatures, the widespread melting of snow and ice, and rising global average sea level.[5] Most of the global warming since the mid-20th century is very likely due to human activities.[6] Benefits and costs of climate change for [human] society will vary widely by location and scale.[7] Some of the effects in temperate and polar regions will be positive and others elsewhere will be negative.[7] Overall, net effects are more likely to be strongly negative with larger or more rapid warming.[7] The range of published evidence indicates that the net damage costs of climate change are likely to be significant and to increase over time.[8] The resilience of many ecosystems is likely to be exceeded this century by an unprecedented combination of climate change, associated disturbances (e.g. flooding, drought, wildfire, insects, ocean acidification) and other global change drivers (e.g. land-use change, pollution, fragmentation of natural systems, over-exploitation of resources).[9] No scientific body of national or international standing maintains a formal opinion dissenting from any of these main points; the last was the American Association of Petroleum Geologists,[10] which in 2007[11] updated its 1999 statement rejecting the likelihood of human influence on recent climate with its current non-committal position.[12] Some other organizations, primarily those focusing on geology, also hold non-committal positions.
Dissenting See also: List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming As of 2007, when the American Association of Petroleum Geologists released a revised statement,[11] no scientific body of national or international standing rejected the findings of human-induced effects on climate change.[10][12]
Brilliant arguments, you must have learned this saavy debating style while attainining your environmental studies degree. Between those 2 arguments, and the 97% Squawk, you have truly mastered the "liberal arts", not to be confused with "martial arts," which would actually entail you defending yourself.
Solar output is going down over the last 40 years even as the earth continues to heat. It's not the sun.
Read and learn douchebag. Just maybe you won't embarrass yourself and the rest of the denialist nutters so much. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_opinion_on_climate_change
fc you are a sick puppy. truly sick in the head. you lie your ass off... then you accuse me of lying... when I state you have no proof man made co2 causes warming. did you read the 71 papers showing it could be the sun a few pages back. I read one of them today and I looked at a few abstracts. how you could say its not the sun... shows you to be a lying troll. you fc are a lying moron. we produce papers you lie about a consensus. If I am lying.. produce a link to the thousands of papers you claim are part of the consensus. if you even look for the link you will see the truth... other than some failed models you have no science.