âPresident Obama knows itâs getting colder. He was foolish enough to blame our recent, pathetic economic growth on record freezing weather. And then he turned around launched a new debate on global warming. In the Obama administration, down is up, two plus two equals five, and ignorance is strength.â Real Science blogger Steven Goddard (which apparently is a pseudonym) claims that U.S. government agencies manipulated data to overstate global warming: âRight after the year 2000, NASA and NOAA dramatically altered US climate history, making the past much colder and the present much warmer.â http://www.inquisitr.com/1322961/gl...f-mankind-says-congressional-candidate-video/
"congressional candidate" ? "Steven Goddard"? LOL Try NOAA asshole. http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/monitoring-references/faq/global-warming.php
You could have stopped reading right here: Originally Posted by fhl âPresident Obama knows itâs getting colder. He was foolish enough to blame our recent, pathetic economic growth on record freezing weather..." Yeah, it's foolish to think that consumers, whose purchases account for two-thirds of GDP, might have chosen to shop a bit less, chosen to stay home a bit more often, while the weather sucked.
" The decrease in real GDP in the first quarter primarily reflected negative contributions from private inventory investment, exports, state and local government spending, nonresidential fixed investment, and residential fixed investment that were partly offset by a positive contribution from PCE. Imports, which are a subtraction in the calculation of GDP, increased." http://www.bea.gov/newsreleases/national/gdp/gdpnewsrelease.htm The warmists consist of nothing but liars and morons spreading disinformation.
Why don't you post a link to the noaa where they state categorically that they haven't replaced real data with computer generated data. I won't hold my breath you lying pos.
One more time........the data was adjusted because of the urban heat island effect.....you deluded moron. And yes computers were involved. It doesn't matter what you will read on an authoritative site.....you won't believe it ....because you are an ignorant delusional conspiracy theory idiot who would rather believe the shit on denialist propaganda websites.
I know this is too much reading for righties but.... "Fox's Steve Doocy... NASA fudged data to make the case for global warming" "......We rate the claim Pants on Fire." http://www.politifact.com/punditfac...oocy-nasa-fudged-data-make-case-global-warmi/ The problem is that right wingers actually believe what Steevy Doofy, Faux News and fringe anonomous bloggers like "Steve Goddard" say.
the gdp thing is a set up. gdp was going to look bad so they made it worse by backing out some govt spending... which will be put back in next quarter to make the economy look good going into the elections. the left is full of crap at all times. they have to destroy the economy to scare the people into adopting their big govt fascist policies but they have to do it in a stealth manner. Its not an easy balancing act... so they manipulate statistics and truth.
its not doocy... its the facts. http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/...more-proof-us-temperature-data-is-manipulated Writing in his Real Science blog, Steven Goddard explained how he found out that NASA had altered U.S. temperature readings to show a warming trend where none existed: He compared graphs published on NASAâs website in 1999 to those available today. He even set up an animation of the two temperature graphs to show the extent of the fraud. Goddard went further by exhuming quotes from climate changers who also have changed their opinions, including the infamous James Hansen. In 2003 Hansen authored a paper for the UNâs Framework Convention on Climate Change entitled âCan We Defuse the Global Warming Time Bomb?â in which he concluded that âhalting global warming requires urgent, unprecedented international cooperationâ with the clear implication that the United Nations was just the group to accomplish it. But back in 1999, Goddard discovered that Hansen co-authored an article at NASAâs Goddard (no relation to Steven) Institute for Space Studies, âWhither U.S. Climate?â in which they claimed: Empirical evidence does not lend much support to the notion that climate is headed precipitately toward more extreme heat and drought. The drought of 1999 covered a smaller area than the 1988 drought when the Mississippi almost dried up.... 1988 was a temporary inconvenience as compared with repeated droughts during the 1930s âDust Bowlâ that caused an exodus from the prairies as chronicled in Steinbeckâs Grapes of Wrath.