16 years 9 months, crazy fast global warming

the data which makes up your chart shows co2 trails ocean warming.

virtually every nutter scientist agrees. you are just about the only troll on eather denying it.

 

Science shows CO2 lags change in temps.. see the peer reviewed paper below.

"The maximum positive correlation between CO2 and temperature is found for CO2 lagging 11–12 months in relation to global sea surface temperature, 9.5-10 months to global surface air temperature, and about 9 months to global lower troposphere temperature. The correlation between changes in ocean temperatures and atmospheric CO2 is high, but do not explain all observed changes."

See: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.08.008

[/QUOTE]

 

It shows CO2 levels going up from man's fossil fuel use which concurrently caused temps to rise.

You fucking piece of shit liar.

 

[/QUOTE]

Meaningless and irrelevant, you broken record piece of shit liar. You may be stupid enough to think it means something pertaining to man made global warming, but it doesn't. Get a fucking clue asswipe.

 

Now scientists want to ban pesticides they claim are killing bees! Where will their greed end??

:frothingatthemouthangry:

 

Impressive, futurecurrents. By your preaching, the professors who reviewed Salby’s book must not be “true scientists”. And, of course, their universities like Caltech, where Einstein worked, and Cambridge, which published Salby’s book, must not be “true universities”.

http://www.amazon.com/Physics-Atmosphere-Climate-Murry-Salby/dp/0521767180

Let’s cut through the smoke, if not the desperation.

Jaworowski showed that there are many processes which make CO2 in ice different from CO2 in the ancient atmosphere. Diffusion is only one, likewise for dissipation processes discussed by Salby. The problem noted by Jaworowski is that such dissipation of CO2 occurs at high pressures (deep in the ice) and over long periods, which makes it impossible to evaluate after the ice is removed. No amount of “ice experts” can get around this.

Bottom line: CO2 in the atmosphere is known for only the last 50 years, when it was measured. Before then, there’s little more than a crystal ball… surrounded by a lot of fog (and, in your case, a lot of wind).
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156"> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if !mso]><object classid="clsid:38481807-CA0E-42D2-BF39-B33AF135CC4D" id=ieooui></object> <style> st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } </style> <![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} </style> <![endif]-->

 

Speaking of which… Were there any doubt about what Gore represents, here is the emperor of doom joining the industrial nudist colony.

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/06/...down-under-calling-for-end-of-the-carbon-tax/

The man who has preached the end of the world because of coal stands shoulder-to-shoulder with a man who makes billions by selling coal to the Chinese and anyone else who will buy it.

<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156"> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-ansi-language:#0400; mso-fareast-language:#0400; mso-bidi-language:#0400;} </style> <![endif]-->

 

this data and this chart is only meaningless for moron trolls.
everyone else can see the green trails the blue by 9 to 12 months.

Which means co2 accumulation or dissipation follows but lags by 9 months the change in ocean temps from one year ago.

Co2 follows ocean temps and does not follow how much co2 man releases.

[/QUOTE]

 

[/QUOTE]

One would have to be a total asshole moron to think that chart means shit. So you pretend it does.

Why are you such a fucking liar?