16 years 9 months, crazy fast global warming

Discussion in 'Politics' started by futurecurrents, Jun 8, 2014.

  1. jem

    jem

    this is for you fraudcurrents...
    co2 lags warming and and man made co2 has not caused the spike in co2.

    "there is no relationship between the fossil carbon emissions curve and the annual carbon increase curve."




    http://notrickszone.com/2013/10/08/...emperature-is-driving-co2-and-not-vice-versa/

    [​IMG]

    The shape of the annual carbon increase resembles the shape of the global sea surface temperature (HADSST3), especially after reliable CO2 measurements began by Keeling after March 1958. Several known events are visible. Counting backwards: the 1998 El Niño, the 1994-5 El Niño, Mt Pinatubo in 1991, the 1986-7 El Niño, Mt Ruiz in 1985, El Chichon eruption in 1982, the 1972-3 El Niño, etc. Every positive peak is an El Niño and every negative peak is associated with a major volcanic eruption.

    As can be seen in Figure 1, there is no relationship between the fossil carbon emissions curve and the annual carbon increase curve. That is because all the fossil emissions carbon is taken up by the biosphere or by the oceans according to Henry’s Law, and then sequestered there. The carbon in the atmosphere is controlled by temperature. This has been described by Dr. Murry Salby in this presentations at Sydney and Hamburg. He compares the CO2 curve to the integral of temperature. Here, I am going the other way mathematically, taking the differential of the CO2 curve as temperature and comparing it to known temperature data, the HADSST3 data.

    - See more at: http://notrickszone.com/2013/10/08/...-co2-and-not-vice-versa/#sthash.gBOX3Ftl.dpuf
     
    #441     Jun 26, 2014
  2. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    Excellent cartoon, Lucrum!
     
    #442     Jun 26, 2014
  3. Thanks Lucrum!
     
    #443     Jun 26, 2014
  4. Good point, Lucrum!
     
    #444     Jun 26, 2014

  5. The ice record is not a proxy for CO2 levels.

    There is nothing wrong with the ice record for CO2 levels. It is certainly accurate enough to determine levels have gone up 40% at the start of the Ind. Rev.. There is zero question about it.

    You are a fucking liar.
     
    #445     Jun 26, 2014
  6. Ricter

    Ricter

    "...the ice record is not a proxy? so you found a half a million year old thermometer?"

    That's quite interesting.
     
    #446     Jun 26, 2014
  7. Singed Toe. Congratulations, you too are also now on ignore. There is nothing from you that will be missed. Go fuck yourself, asshole.
     
    #447     Jun 26, 2014
  8. That's how clueless jerm is. He thinks the ice record is a proxy for CO2 levels.
     
    #448     Jun 26, 2014
  9. Ricter

    Ricter

    I was wondering when we started using thermometers to measure CO2.
     
    #449     Jun 26, 2014
  10. Tsing Tao

    Tsing Tao

    Boo hoo! :) Pretty soon you'll have the whole forum on ignore!
     
    #450     Jun 26, 2014