Show me the science proving evolution. You can't because there isn't any. According to you. You must have bizarre nut job definition of science is all I can figure. Like I said jerm. It doesn't matter what YOU think. Really.
You are wrong. The consensus is overwhelming. The debate is over among the scientists. I'm really tempted to put on ignore again Lucrum. Your just too offensively stupid. By any other name, you are still an idiot.
Global temperature standstill âis the biggest embarrassment for a supposed scientific âconsensusâ since Piltdown Manâ.
No it's not, you idiot. It's really not an embarrassment at all. Temps are within predicted ranges. You are deluded and ignorant.
Michael Mannâs hockeystick blade is now pointed down into the ocean depths and the heat follows the blade down. This is true science and 75% of all scientists agree with this.
"Consensus" doesn't mean jack shit, moron, and if you had a functioning brain you'd grasp that. It was "consensus" at one time that the earth was flat and center of the universe. Not to mention that no objective scientist with integrity would ever take the positions you say they all do because it's way too complicated with far too many interacting variables for the faux "certainty" AGW moonbats like you claim. Lucrum? Wrong again! But feel free to take your bottle and scamper off if you can't handle my reality checks on your moonbattery.
Bullshit. You have heard of the IPCC, haven't you? Here's an excerpt from their report showing how so-called climatologists' models failed during the pause you claim didn't happen (observed temps are the thick black lines).