You mean THIS APS that says this? LOL American Physical Society "The evidence is incontrovertible: Global warming is occurring. If no mitigating actions are taken, significant disruptions in the Earthâs physical and ecological systems, social systems, security and human health are likely to occur. We must reduce emissions of greenhouse gases beginning now."
And no NASA did not "rewrite history". They adjusted the data to account for urban siting of weather stations. Stop repeating lies gwb. One thing to be a moron. Another to be a spreader of lies.
Futurecurrents??! The Real Futurecurrents? You do know that there IS no futurecurrents right? It's a fake name just like the "science" he posts. <== well the science you post IS fake but NOT because of your nic Because you're probably too dense to grasp the irony, I'll spell it out... your "logic" negates everything you write too, unless "futurecurrents" is your legal name. As usual you focus on the irrelevant and dismiss anything that conflicts with your phony AGW narrative. Bullshit. Here's more about the ringleader of the circus at NASA who was the subject of the article I posted: James Hansenâs Former NASA Supervisor Declares Himself a Skeptic Says Hansen âEmbarrassed NASAâ & âWas Never Muzzledâ http://www.epw.senate.gov/public/in...ecord_id=1a5e6e32-802a-23ad-40ed-ecd53cd3d320 EDITORIAL: Exit Jim Hansen NASAâs hot-air scientist cashes in James E. Hansen will no longer be touring the country preaching his end-times hysteria, collecting a $158,832 government paycheck for it. Mr. Hansen demonstrated a certain mastery of the art of leveraging, using his position as head of NASAâs Goddard Institute for Space Studies to promote a personal brand of global warming quackery. On Tuesday, Mr. Hansen announced his retirement. The vaudeville circuit wonât be the same. Read more at: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/apr/4/exit-jim-hansen/#ixzz34iz6zCo8
More on the fraud that NASA has become, here's an excerpt from: A Conversation With Apollo Astronaut Walter Cunningham About A Vital Need To Restore Climate Science Integrity "Many of NASAâs retirees have grown increasingly concerned that GISS, a NASA organization located in a midtown Manhattan office building, was allowing its science to be politicized, compromising their credibility. Our concern, beyond damage to the NASAâs exemplary reputation, was damage to their current or former scientists and employees, and even compromising the reputation of science itself. We developed a letter to NASA Administrator Charlie Bolden and obtained signatures from seven Apollo astronauts, several former Headquarters managers and Center directors, and 40 former management-level technical specialists. We asked that he restrain NASA from including unproven claims in public releases and on websites. Statements by NASA that man-made carbon dioxide was having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of empirical data. It is clear that the science is NOT settled. The unbridled advocacy of CO2 being the major cause of climate change is inconsistent with NASAâs history of conducting an objective assessment of all available scientific data prior to making decisions or public statements. They should be emphasizing to the media that human- caused global warming is a hypothesis, not a scientific fact." Read full interview at: http://www.forbes.com/sites/larrybe...al-need-to-restore-climate-science-integrity/
He and they are confused. Disseminating science is not political or propaganda. They are not climate scientists and they just more ignorant deluded right wing nut jobs, like you. The basic science about man made global certainly IS settled. At least among the people that know the most about the science. We know this by various metrics. One of which is that in 2013, out of about 9000 authors of climate science papers, only one, yes one, denied it. Those that continue to deny it, like you, are simply fools. http://blogs.scientificamerican.com...s-on-global-warming-9136-agree-one-disagrees/
If he actually said that he was wrong. Many climatologists predicted the current rate of warming. It is well within the model's projections.
The basic science is absolutely not settled. What's settled is that you're an idiot and many "climate scientists" are politically driven frauds. Here are 71 scientific papers that negate the claim made in the very first paragraph of the blog you linked to. http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2014/01/71-new-papers-reported-in-2013.html Explain how a gas that's only 1/2500th of the atmosphere, which leads and lags temperatures and has been uncoupled from temperatures for centuries at a time, trumps ALL other physical, chemical and biological processes that govern the planet and "controls the temps." You can't and neither can "climate scientists, " not even the ones at the AMA. P.S. Consensus even if real doesn't mean jack squat. You're an idiot for "thinking" that too.
Maybe you can ask your inflatable Obama boyfriend tonight. Nonsense. The models of the so-called "climatologists" have failed spectacularly.