Thanks for this. Sounds like a classic approach - use fundamentals to select large, successful and growing companies in expanding business sectors, then use TA to time a ride on their price momentum. There's no reason why this wouldn't work as stated. The fact that this is a "traditional" and simple approach does not make it invalid.
The proof is in the video!!!! I must have missed it. Or we have a different definition of the word 'proof'.
another NY Shyster...probably living in FLA or Cali... The proof is in the picture of the bull...as in, bullshit...
what trading approach? buying companies that have good fundamentals? Tech is hot! Cryptocurrencies! Anyone who claims 100% accuracy is a bonafide loser...
Over all time periods? In all markets? Under all market conditions? Over all holding periods? I must be missing something that you have picked up on because to me this approach, running up to a 16% gain, just doesn't sound too fantastical to be believed.
Is this guy back? I already know who it is lol. He has me on ignore so I can't see the original post.... but he posted a video here a few months back basically saying bet the farm on this "little known stock" called Taiwan Semi (TSM) when it was $44. When I pointed out that it (the "little known stock") was the number one holding in the SMH ETF he went ham on me. His track record is not that good. TSM is still $45.
After a few years trading the type of pitch from narcissistic guy is too obvious. Yeah, the video is fine but it is like negative space inviting the desperate noob to fill it in. "Afraid of success" is so damned cheesy. Remember that Tanti vendor guy recently? every post he made deleted from the site? Vendors being stealthy, if not one, don't act exactly like a stereotypical scammer I'd advise the OP.
This is not an ‘approach’ It’s not the 16% gain - it’s the 100% accuracy ClAim. Why am I debating this with a sock puppet?