Again, you're wrong on the number of crusades. Obviously you still haven't fact checked yourself because you're still clueless about it. Also, I never said anyone should change their religion. Only an idiot (like you) could think I meant that because the countries we've been talking about don't have national religions. No wonder you're a libturd; you're can't get basic facts straight or even understand simple sentences.
Ok brainiac how many Crusades were there in total? Were in a thread about Britain where there is no separation between church and state, now lets try and work within your sphere of intellect; the United Kingdom was created in 1707 the Treaty of Union that led to the formation of the United Kingdom of Great Britain ensured that there would be a Protestant succession as well as a link between church and state that still remains. Now there we have it a "national religion". Whats with this "libturd" nonsense what does it mean, its not in the least offensive but just silly and childish.
You're an ignorant, delusional, hate-filled moron. Explain what teachings of Christ (who was a Jew) say Germans are racially superior and should exterminate Jews, Gypsies and the handicapped because they're a biological threat to the Aryan race. Explain what teachings of Christ say that Slavic people are inferior. Explain why denazification was done in the wake of the Holocaust instead of purging Christianity. Etc., etc...
You see associations where there are none: And don't see them when they do exist. I'm in awe of your STUpidity.
Google the crusades and find out for yourself. Unlike the number of crusades your point is semantics. You can call it a "national religion" but I wouldn't because it's not mandatory and about 30% of the people in the UK are not Christians. I call liberals who are full of shit (like you) libturds. I couldn't care less what you think of it.