Your suggestion is good. After all the screenshots are released on the last day, the excel format data files of all 10000 transactions will be issued.
"Why can't you just post an Excel with all these trades. I would like to analyze the results to have a CORRECT view on the performance. That is impossible with your screenshots." Because his intention is to show one side of his trading and hide the other side.
Any investor can do this, it is not a secret. You can buy any amount of stocks and don't sell them unless they are in profits, even it needs 30 years. So your trades are 100% winning trades, even the losers you hold cause your account balance go to near zero, you are still having 100% winning trades. 1000 winning trades and 100% winning trades doesn't mean your account make money.
That's right. I would like to emphasize once again that what we are showing now is just the profit making approach. The key is risk control management and strict discipline.
You are right. So, I'm showing a method that everyone can try to do. It only costs 10000 cents, that is, 100 dollars. Then, in the process of doing it, slowly think about risk control and strictly observe discipline.
To this end, I wrote a book specifically for this purpose, which tells us that parents can open a 10000 cent solid account for children over 10 years old, just like I do now, to train discipline.
Absolutely true and that was my point in both of my posts made to this thread. Most elitetraders don't pay attention to these other elements. That is probably why so many give you heat when you say what is possible to earn in profits. They cannot conceive of the opportunities the market offers because they do not consider anything other than buy and sell. Through your posts it is obvious to me that your understanding is beyond that of your critics. I was reading a journal here a few weeks ago where the journal author scalps MES contracts. He gets all kinds of heat from people telling him he can't or shouldn't average in because one hedge fund trader said "losers average losers" one time in prehistory. These critics never stop to think "what if his position size and trading plan factors in that in some trades he will NOT get an opportunity to add up to his full size?" They see only the RISK of loss to his adding. They don't consider his loss of OPPORTUNINTY if he doesn't add.