1/4% Tax on all stock trades pushed in NY Times today

Discussion in 'Taxes and Accounting' started by seasideheights, Jan 13, 2009.

  1. It was a regular, i forgot his name. He was saying it would cost him a huge amount additionally ($50k+) and that there were many other firms around the country, trading like they were, and in his firm alone, the tax would cost 5-7 jobs.

    Erin and Gasparino responded:

    "I am surprised they havent taxed this already"

    I am quite disappointed in Erin - Thought she was smarter than this.
     
    #1111     Sep 3, 2009
  2. jj69

    jj69

    The tax was mentioned again this morning on "squawk on the street" segment. 9:30 ish Erin's question(smiling) to Dave Rovelli? "Do you really think this (small) tax would make that much difference (in trading)?" She later accentuates that it would raise 100-150bil/yr. She has her mind made up that this tax might actually be useful. Steve Liesman - "I can't belive they haven't taxed it already."
     
    #1112     Sep 3, 2009
  3. i am thinking they know it will come up, next week with Obama's speech. so they are supporting him and the action.
     
    #1113     Sep 3, 2009
  4. Maybe if the government actually created jobs instead of destoying jobs and wealth, we would already have the extra $100B.

    from Bloomberg More Americans than Anticipated File Unemployment Claims
    http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&sid=aqgweyLi6lYA


     
    #1114     Sep 3, 2009
  5. jj69

    jj69

    Do they not not realize that there is no Fast/Mad Money if this tax passes? And whether small daytraders matter or not, their general ratings HAS to decline meaningfully as well. We need to write to the FastMoney crew and Cramer and have them be on top of this thing.
     
    #1115     Sep 3, 2009
  6. bpcnabe

    bpcnabe

    Pound this station with your emails expressing your better informed view of why this tax is bad. People like Liesman who has a left leaning slant will not be deterred but other anchors and commentators need to hear from the people who would be affected but such a "small tax". Don't let up.
     
    #1117     Sep 3, 2009
  7. haha and u all thought blowjob burnett would read your emails
     
    #1118     Sep 3, 2009
  8. TraDaToR

    TraDaToR

    I am afraid. That's exactly what I think.
     
    #1119     Sep 3, 2009
  9. cstfx

    cstfx

    About 3:45 in

    <param name="type" value="application/x-shockwave-flash"/>
    <param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"/>
    <param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"/>
    <param name="quality" value="best"/>
    <param name="scale" value="noscale" />
    <param name="wmode" value="transparent"/>
    <param name="bgcolor" value="#000000"/>
    <param name="salign" value="lt"/>
    <param name="movie" value="http://plus.cnbc.com/rssvideosearch/action/player/id/1239374779/code/cnbcplayershare"/>
    <embed name="cnbcplayer" PLUGINSPAGE="http://www.macromedia.com/go/getflashplayer" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" bgcolor="#000000" height="380" width="400" quality="best" wmode="transparent" scale="noscale" salign="lt" src="http://plus.cnbc.com/rssvideosearch/action/player/id/1239374779/code/cnbcplayershare" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" />
    </object>
     
    #1120     Sep 3, 2009