The US is sane compared to Canada. Canada’s Supreme Court Legalizes Some Sex Acts with Animals Canada’s highest court has just ruled that some sex acts between humans and animals are legal. http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...a-supreme-court-legalized-humans-sex-animals/
Somehow I just always knew there wasn't something quite w̶h̶i̶t̶e̶ right about the first two posters.
Please point out at what point in the video where he says, you haven't met the white race. I listened a couple of times and heard no mention on race. Perhaps your leftist tendencies, and one of those being a preoccupation with race, has you hearing things that aren't being said. Could it be this is the root of your perception of racism where none exists? Why must you leftists fabricate racism in every instance? Could it be the one last thing you have in your political arsenal is dying out? What is the left without the continually drum beat of racism? Your party has become an empty vessel full of promises which have already been exposed as nothing more than a attempt to keep people in a constant state of perceived oppression. The harm your party has brought to the black community is on a level of genocide unparalleled in modern history.
From your link: In April, animal advocates were seen protesting at the state capital in Columbus to raise awareness that Ohio has no law outlawing sexual exploitation of animals after a 61-year-old man was arrested for committing sex acts with dogs.
You are pathetic. You lack the basic cognitive skills to distinguish the difference between the two articles.
I suggest you have a closer look at what you post. Your blinding hate and lack of attention to detail has already gotten you in trouble in another thread, remember? https://www.elitetrader.com/et/thre...r-marching-orders.301970/page-14#post-4323765 As for your reference to some key difference, I suggest you read another section in your own post, beginning with: "The question is a troublesome one here in the U.S. as well..."
You are correct, there was no mention of "white." However, I think there might have been a bit of dog-whistle in that message. You know, about "real" Americans. you will note how dismissively the rhinestone cowboy spoke of the president. Why? He didn't take any of your guns away, did he? More terrorists were killed under Obama's watch than under GWB's. Did the NRA ever call GWB a flower child or weak-kneed? Obama deported more illegals than GWB. So what's with the utterly disrespectful name-calling and the comparison to the "real" America? Rhetorical question. Has any other president before Obama ever been directly contrasted with "real" Americans? Another rhetorical question. He may not have actually said "real," but you know it's there by implication. There was a lot of hate in that ad, and it wasn't only directed at potential terrorists.