Why arent these phony interviews with Joe and Hunter Biden considered illegal campaign contributions

Discussion in 'Politics' started by wildchild, Oct 28, 2019.

  1. wildchild

    wildchild

    The 60 Minutes interview was not an interview, it was an infomercial for Joe Biden. It was softball question after softball question. There was a time when 60 Minutes was actually considered a decent journalistic show. It is a complete joke now.

    The ABC News interview with Hunter Biden was even worst. ABC News actually has Bill Clinton's right hand man as its top 'news' person. It is a disgrace.

    Since these were not 'news' pieces and the interviews where nothing but propaganda pieces, it is clear to me, the corporations who aired the pieces are in violation of campaign finance laws. Joe Biden should be charged for the time. Joe is low on money and Bernie and Fauxcahontas are both taking in a considerable more in cash than Creepy Joe, so the establishment stepped and threw Joe a life line. I am sure the DNC played a role in it too because we all know how level the playing field is as far as the DNC is concerned.
     
  2. Tony Stark

    Tony Stark

    Why arent the phony interviews with Trump and Fox News considered illegal campaign contributions
     
  3. On the plus side, since the dems are now fully committed to impeaching Joe Biden- excuse, I meant Donald Trump- Hunter gonna be appearing before the Senate - possibly even before the House too if they formalize the process which gives the pubs subpoena rights- for extended "dialogue" before it is over.

    I wonder if he will be wearing a ski mask when he comes in. Even though he claims full transparency that ski mask would be a give-away. We shall see.