Maybe the media doesn't want to get them even more angry then they already are? Where is the outrage when black men commit racist killings against white people? (msn.com) Washington Examiner Where is the outrage when black men commit racist killings against white people? Opinion by Christopher Tremoglie • 9h ago Where is the outrage when black men commit racist killings against white people?© Provided by Washington Examiner How many white people must die due to racism before the media and Democratic presidents and politicians start discussing them? After the incidents of the last few weeks, it’s an important question that needs answers. And it’s a recurring omission that we should all be tired of happening at this point. You’ve probably heard of Jordan Neely. He was the black man who died on May 1 in New York City after Daniel Penny, a former Marine, placed him in a chokehold after Neely harassed and threatened passengers. The case is under investigation, and people still do not know all the details of the incident, yet Neely was already considered a victim of racism. Outrage ensued, and somehow, almost instantly, protest signs were printed and distributed, and rallies were organized (including some by the New York Young Communist League — a political group that fuels many acts of these demonstrations of racial animosity and division). BIDEN'S MISINFORMATION Conversely, have you heard of Lundin Hathcock? How about James McDaniel? They were two people shot to death in Tulsa, Oklahoma, last week. Have you heard of the killer, Carlton Gilford? I would guess that most people haven’t heard about any of them. But Gilford was the black man who shot both white people on April 18. Tulsa police charged him with two counts of first-degree murder, two counts of shooting with intent to kill, and one count of malicious intimidation or harassment — Oklahoma’s version of a hate crime charge. Two incidents of interracial homicide, a couple of weeks apart, and only one of them received widespread media attention and scrutiny. Only Neely’s death made most newspapers and the talk show circuit. The legacy media purposely cover up hate crimes committed by black people because it doesn’t fit the cultural and political left-wing agenda. Furthermore, as people have tried to shape Neely’s death as a hate crime, Hathcock and McDaniel’s deaths were actual hate crimes. Yet those who parade around pretending to be outraged about racism do not care when the victims are white. Where is the outrage when black men commit racist killings against white people? Democratic presidents, politicians, pundits, professors, teachers, and legacy media don’t even remotely care about white victims of hate crimes. They routinely engage in despicable omissions to advance radical, agenda-driven narratives to perpetuate myths about a systemic racist and white supremacist society. They claim to care about ending racism but are only concerned when the victims are nonwhite people. And many times, they even falsely insert racism into incidents in which there originally wasn’t any. People must become vigilant in exposing the Left’s indoctrination and brainwashing campaign on racism and hate crimes. It is an utter disgrace, though unsurprising, that Gilford didn’t receive as much attention as Neely. It is an incident that affects everyone. It isn’t a white or black thing or a Republican or Democratic thing. We should strive to end all hate crimes and racism, not just those the Left can use for political propaganda. Every victim of hate crime matters, regardless of skin color.
Cuddles, please explain the pic above. Why Blacks are 10x as violent towards Whites as Whites are towards Blacks? And why the media and Democratic politicians make it seem like the opposite is happening? Bet you won't, because you can't. It doesn't go along with your agenda, right?
Whites are 5x the population of blacks so if blacks and whites were racially agnostic with their victims and committed crimes at the same rates one would expect blacks to commit 5x as many crimes against whites as whites do against blacks. However, violent crime is much higher in the black communities (even against their own race) so it's not surprising that the rate for black on white crime is 10x as high as white on black crime. In conclusion, this statistic of 10x higher black on white versus white on black crime doesn't show evidence of racism by black people against white people at all. Also, there's significant disparities in dating. Black men date white women more than white men date black women. Men are significantly more violent in general so a lot of the disparity could come from domestic abuse. This isn't a sign of black on white racism being the motivating factor.
I don't care if racism is involved, the damage is done just the same. But there are plenty of black on white crimes with racist intent, like the killings in Tulsa not too long ago. The fact is black crime is out of control while liberals are trying to reduce prison populations.
Police: Suspect Said They Wanted to Kill 'White Person' Lawrence Herr, a 66-year-old white man, was killed April 10 while installing a mailbox outside a home in Kenner, La., a suburb of New Orleans. Tahj Matthews, 23, and Maurice Holmes, 25, who are Black, were arrested the next day and charged with first-degree murder. At the hearing, the lead detective on the case, Nick Engler, was asked why Matthews and Holmes targeted Herr. Engler said that under questioning, Matthews said they "wanted to kill a white person," WWL-TV reported.
Funny that you bring up the city of Tulsa, which was probably the best example of a thriving black economy we've ever had in this country. That was until 1921 when the Tulsa Race Massacre happened. It's not like slavery ended and everything's been great with equal opportunity ever since for black people.
I've never said it was, but that's not a license to kill. Plenty of immigrants have arrived since the Civil War with nothing more than the shirts on the back, have faced discrimination, and have made it into the upper classes (or their descendants have). The root cause of black poverty is low IQ, which is not fixable except through eugenics. Those in the 'talented tenth' with IQs over 100 are doing about as well as their white peers as far as IQ is concerned.
Black man charged with murder in possible hate crime after shooting two white strangers in the back of the head “The information suggests that race played a role in it,” Tulsa County District Attorney Steve Kunzweiler told local CBS affiliate KOTV. “I feel like that is something we can prove, and it is something that a judge or jury obviously needs to listen to. So, we will present that information along with everything else.”
Killing is going to be the result of inner city poverty with little upward mobility. When you're shut out of the mainstream economy you turn to the black market. There hasn't been enough scientific evidence to prove racial disparities in IQ are genetic or not either way. When they've tried to control the environments the disparities have been rather small (like less than 5 IQ points). In order to prove what you're suggesting you would actually have to find what alleles actually determine IQ performance as the alleles that determine skin color/physical features almost certainly have no genetic determination for IQ. It doesn't mean that other alleles that do help determine IQ can't be more correlated to people with those physical characteristics though. It's clear that black people can still be at the upper extreme in intelligence. The best example to me is actually Phil Ivey. Most people consider him the GOAT poker player which is a game that has high level competition and it requires an exceptionally high level of intelligence to master. You can't bullshit what he's done. I also don't think it's fair to compare immigrants to black people. Immigrants work harder than everybody, including white people. That's why they were willing to pack up and move for a better life. Not everybody is willing to do that. You could look at places like Appalachia for a fairer comparison. Both people in many black communities and people in Appalachia have given up moving and seeking for something better, hence they stay in high levels of poverty. The inner city offers a larger market though for illicit black market activity. To argue that racism isn't a problem is fucked up when studies have shown that white-sounding names get 50% more interviews than black sounding names for the same resume and black home owners have to sell their homes for less for the same profile home: