Been on here a long time but can't seem to recover my old nick (hence the new account) Can anybody shed some light on what is the actual name for this position? - Short ITM put - Short ITM call - Long OTM put - Long OTM call Same expiry and quantity for all 4. Is that an inverted strangle with wings? I guess it's slightly asymmetric from looking at the TOS profit/loss chart but it doesn't have to be. Dest or one of you other options guru/heavies, can you help me out here? Thanks in advance. M
If this was : - Long ITM put - Long ITM call - Short OTM put - Short OTM call ...then it would be a 'Box spread'. But as you are doing the opposite, then I guess you could call this a 'short box spread', ie. you are selling the box spread as opposed to buying it.
If it were an OTM put vertical and an OTM call vertical, I think it would be an iron condor. A strangle is also normally OTM and I believe it's called "inverted" if your put/call are both ITM. The long OTM wings are just that. Perhaps it doesn't even have a name (IB just lists it as a "combo") Since it has the same P&L curve as an iron condor, perhaps it's better termed a synthetic? (not sure if I'm using that term appropriately here). Anyway, that's why I hoping some of the local options masters will chime in to: a) identify this baby b) potential issues with the position I'm most interested in b as the only risk I currently see is possible assignment risk and maybe a margin call at a unfavorable time due to draconian IB "auto-liquidate" Note also that this position does not require "legging" in to achieve. Also of note is that I don't claim to be an options master by any stretch. I'm just trying to identify potential foolishness as I just can't seem to pick a hole in it. Thanks
And my understanding of the major risk of a box spread is assignment risk, correct? I recall seeing a video where some RobinHood guy (Ir0nyman) loaded up on a ton of contracts and then got crushed.
FFS1001, I think you nailed it. Looks like a short box spread. For those who are interested, here's the ironyman link Seems like major risk (other than ridiculous over leverage) is assignment and auto-liquidation.
I am curious if you are using same strikes or putting your long positions inside or outside your short positions? I played with your idea with SPY and just figuring out what you are wishing to accomplish?
I edited your OP with strikes. You would be short the 90-110 box. Short the guts/inside; long the outside.