https://insideclimatenews.org/news/23062024/west-virginia-senate-race-energy-policy/ In West Virginia, the Senate Race Outcome May Shift Limits of US Climate Ambitions The departure of Sen. Joe Manchin appears to end the second-leading coal-producing state’s decades at the fulcrum of federal energy policy. By James Bruggers, Marianne Lavelle, June 23, 2024 For decades, West Virginia has elected senators who have played an oversized role in United States energy policy, backing fossil fuels and resisting robust action on climate change. Sen. Joe Manchin may have been outside the mainstream of the Democratic party in his views, but in a closely divided Senate, he was able to set the boundaries of what President Joe Biden could accomplish on climate. Manchin opted to refrain from testing a moderate’s chances at re-election given West Virginia’s sharp political turn to the right. He announced he would retire at the end of this year, and broke from the Democrats entirely in May when he registered as an Independent. Now, the race to fill his seat this fall could radically change West Virginia’s role as the state limiting the ambitions of national climate policy. The nation’s No. 2 coal state could elect a full-throated, fossil fuel-boosting senator in November—in fact, coal operator and businessman Jim Justice, the current Republican governor and an acolyte of former President Donald Trump, is running more than 30 points ahead in the latest polls. But Justice, 73, would just add to what is now essentially the unanimous pro-fossil fuel bloc of Republicans in Congress. His Democratic opponent, Glenn Elliott, 52, an attorney and mayor of Wheeling, sits firmly in the mainstream of his party on climate change. Elliott argues that warming is bringing dangerous weather extremes like torrential downpours to West Virginia and that an energy transition away from fossil fuels is inevitable. The choice for West Virginia voters on one side or the other of the nation’s politically polarized energy policy couldn’t be clearer. But the 2024 Senate race also ends the state’s long reign at the fulcrum of that policy, with the balance in the Senate often tipped by Manchin over his 14 years in Washington, and for more than 50 years prior, by his predecessor, the late Sen. Robert Byrd. In a speech two years ago, Justice downplayed renewable wind and solar power, and even the prospect of energy powered by hydrogen, as “the parsley around the side of the plate” where “oil, gas and coal” are the “meat and potatoes.” Of climate change, Justice said, “I don’t know if it’s for real or not.” In backing coal, he went on to play the religion card, while ignoring the economic reality of coal losing its competitive edge to natural gas and renewable energy. “I truly believe with all my heart that God wants us to progress and like it or not, civilization only progresses with abundant cheap energy,” he said. For his part, Elliott said in an interview that he is “not trying to end anybody’s job in coal. But I do think we need to start thinking in a much more sort of open-minded, expansive way the way we make our energy. “The market itself is going to steer us away from a fossil fuel-based energy production model and we need to be doing something to prepare for that reality, instead of just doubling down on the way we’ve done things.” ‘Acres of Diamonds Under Our Feet’ West Virginia remains the second-largest coal-producing state despite a plummet in production by more than half over the last 15 years. Over about the same period, West Virginia has emerged from a regional fracking boom as the fourth-largest producer of natural gas. The state’s representatives in Washington have sought to maintain the dominance of fossil fuel in the nation’s energy system, playing a leading role in some of the earliest debates in Congress on climate change. In 1997, Byrd, by then former Senate Majority Leader, reached across the aisle to join with Nebraska Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel to author and secure a unanimous resolution opposing the United Nations climate agreement known as the Kyoto Protocol that was then taking shape, effectively blocking U.S. ratification of the treaty. Another significant Byrd moment came 10 years later when the Senate was debating what eventually became the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007. The Democrats had full control of Congress for the first time since 1993, with the Senate essentially evenly split as it is today. It was the Democrats’ big chance to address climate change. The legislation that President George H.W. Bush ultimately signed improved fuel economy and supported biofuels and energy efficiency. But mainly because of Byrd and other Democratic “moderates” at the time, the Senate jettisoned the House-passed effort to establish a National Renewable Energy Portfolio standard like those that were becoming popular at the state level. The proposal was for 15 percent of U.S. power to come from clean energy. “Our coal supplies are large enough to last for generations, fueling the electricity needs of our homes and our businesses,” Byrd said on the Senate floor. “We don’t have to ask someone else for this cheaper and abundant energy source; it is right here, like acres of diamonds, under our feet. It is there, there in the ground, for the taking.” Most recently, Manchin, whose family also has coal interests and who has been a tireless advocate for coal mining and miners, played a leading role in limiting the scope of President Biden’s clean energy and green infrastructure aspirations by effectively killing the $2 trillion Build Back Better plan that Biden ran on in 2020. Manchin then provided pivotal votes to secure passage of two landmark bills—the $1.2 trillion Bipartisan Infrastructure Law of 2021 and the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022. However, the infrastructure law is heavily weighted to road and bridge building instead of public transit or clean alternatives. Biden’s originally planned $174 billion investment in electric vehicles and a network of charging stations was pared back to $7.5 billion for EVs, charging infrastructure and electric school buses, for example. While the Inflation Reduction Act invests $370 billion in fighting climate change, more federal dollars than any other federal action, Manchin made sure the legislation included items that bolstered the fossil fuel industry, such as a requirement that the U.S. government offer millions of acres of federal land for new oil and gas leasing over the next decade. Some environmental critics decried the fossil fuel support, with one calling the comprises “climate suicide,” but other Washington insiders who support climate action praise Manchin’s bipartisan approach. Manchin doesn’t get the credit he deserves in climate policy circles, with his legislative style of seeking bipartisan cooperation, said Sasha Mackler, executive director of the Energy Program at the Bipartisan Policy Center, a Washington-based think tank. “Sen. Manchin has been a leader on these issues for a very long time, and has at times been a bit of a thorn in the side of the climate policy community,” Mackler said. “But he has also enabled significant action to happen, and that has been very important in setting an energy agenda that has broad support from both Democrats and Republicans.” Debts, Fines and Babydog The Cook Political Report rates the 2024 Senate race in West Virginia as “solid” Republican. Justice is viewed as an “extremely popular governor here, and also comparatively, nationwide,” said Sam Workman, a professor of political science and director of the Institute for Policy Research and Public Affairs at West Virginia University. Given Justice’s strong position in the race, Workman doesn’t see the governor trying to engage his challenger very much, hoping to “coast to victory,” he said. “On that chord, Gov. Justice is signaling more than ever his alignment with sort of national Republican priorities,” such as Southern border control and immigration. “He’s lockstep in line with President Trump’s take on things.” Political observers in the state say he takes advantage of an “aw-shucks” manner of speaking and the ever-presence of an English bulldog, Babydog. Neither Justice’s campaign nor the governor’s office responded to requests for an interview. On his campaign website, Justice promises to “remain a coal, natural gas and oil champion.” Justice earned the endorsement of the West Virginia Manufacturers Association in part because of the governor’s views on energy production, said Bill Bissett, president of the lobby group. “We are an association that believes in energy development, not just with coal, but with all forms of energy. Overall, we have found him to be definitely willing to listen and definitely not stand in the way of energy industry development,” Bissett said. Bissett said the state’s economy is going in the right direction, “so to continue that leadership, from the governor’s office to the U.S. Senate simply made a lot of sense to us.” Bissett also praised Justice’s “overall business acumen” as the patriarch of a family enterprise that includes coal, agriculture and, since 2009, the historic and plush Greenbrier resort, which he bought out of bankruptcy. But state and national news reports, from the Mountain State Spotlight and ProPublica to Politico and the New York Times, paint Justice’s business practices in a far different light. Formerly on the Forbes billionaire list, Justice inherited a fortune in coal interests from his father, and his family’s companies have faced and continue to confront a staggering trail of lawsuits, debt and environmental health and safety fines. The environmental and safety record of mining companies run by the Justice family is among the worst in the industry, said West Virginia University Law Professor Pat McGinley, who came to the state in 1975 and has worked on behalf of coalfield residents and successfully challenged the permitting of mountaintop removal coal mining. McGinley counts “literally millions of dollars” in fines paid on “thousands” of mine safety violations, while the Environmental Protection Agency has also sought payment of millions of dollars in fines from Justice family coal companies. “His companies have failed to reclaim mine lands after the coal has been extracted” in states across Appalachia, leaving scarred landscapes “oozing acid mine drainage, causing flooding, soil erosion, sedimentation and putting miners’ lives at risk,” McGinley said. Justice “is right at the forefront of those who wink and nod at mine safety and environmental regulation. In the Senate, I’ve no doubt that that’s where he will go,” McGinley said. Elliott said his campaign intends to show how Justice hasn’t had “to play by the same rules as everyone else.” Looking Forward vs. ‘the Past’ West Virginia Democratic consultant Mike Plante, who is not working on Elliott’s campaign, said Democrats running for statewide office in West Virginia have a chance if they can demonstrate they are putting West Virginia first. He sees the race as a referendum on Justice and one offering divergent outlooks. “Glenn Elliott represents the future of West Virginia,” Plante said, describing him as “forward-looking. And Jim Justice represents the past.” Elliott is a Wheeling native who left home to earn academic degrees from the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School of Business and Georgetown University’s law school. He worked as a legislative assistant to Byrd from 1994 to 1999 and practiced corporate law in the Washington area before returning home in 2009 to set up a solo law practice. He’s been mayor of the state’s third-largest city since 2016. Manchin endorsed him before the May 14 Democratic primary, when Elliott defeated two other candidates. Elliott, following at least part of the Democratic Party playbook, touts women’s health issues and reproductive choice as among his top campaign themes. Democrats elsewhere have found success defending pro-choice positions in the wake of the Supreme Court’s reversal of Roe v. Wade two years ago, after which West Virginia lawmakers almost completely banned abortion. “A lot of people who may not be completely comfortable with (abortion) are now saying, wait a second, we went too far, and we are making women in West Virginia almost second-class citizens,” Elliott said. “So for me, that’s the single most critical issue for this campaign.” Regarding energy, Elliott said he recognizes the role that West Virginia coal has played in the economy of the state and nation but coal has also “come at great cost. It’s killed a lot of miners either directly in the mines or it has sickened miners after the fact. It’s damaged a lot of communities. “It’s important for West Virginia’s senator to advocate that if we’re going to be moving away from these fossil fuels that we’ve always relied on, West Virginia needs to make sure we get made whole in that equation. We can’t be just left behind.”
I pinned this article here not because I care what happens in West Virginia, because I don't at all, but because I think it's important to abide by the democratic process, regardless of outcome. I don't shy away from voicing my opinions as I've been a strong advocate for green energies and EVs. I'm also far from the MAGA world and yet strongly anti unions. I'm not sure what that makes me but whatever. Upon reading the article, I had a great sense that West Virginia ought to do and be what West Virginians want it to be, through the electoral process we call democracy. If they want to be coal, oil and gas and ICE vehicles, it's their choice, at least that of their majority. Other states may choose green energies and EVs like the coastal western states and the Northeast, because their population want that change. The primary function of the federal government is to ensure sufficient harmony among the states to interoperate and legislate when things get overly complicated. It is not to impose on states what their population doesn't want. The greater motivator for change comes from observing others conditions. East Germans rushed West as soon as the wall came tumbling down, not the other way around. Chinese millionnaires today are fleeing China today faster than at any other time. The same holds true in America. Let the states run themselves however they want to, and let their population decide if they're better off packing up and moving or fighting for their voice to be heard. Let me posit that if the South had been allow to hold on to their racial segregation, there would be no people of color in the South and eventually they would have had to make strategic changes if they had wanted their economy to survive. Change comes from within, not imposed by outside parties. I understand that the fear expressed over many decades is that America would break up into various countries if it wasn't for a strong federal government to impose cohesion through uniformity. But today's America is proof that it's not working. Every group wants to push their values onto all others, on the Right and the Left, no compromise acceptable. The only way we as a nation are going to move past our differences is to accept that some states are going to be very different from what we're accustomed to, almost different countries, but that's ok. Because sometime in the future, we may look at our neighbors successes and failures and decide that we want to be more like them, and vote for people who will lead us there. The federal government's responsibility is to ensure that freedom to vote will always be available.
It would be nice if votes were counted correctly and we the people are the ones making decisions. Get rid of the election machines. National referendum's to give power to the people. Thank Senator Manchin and Senator Sinema for blocking Dem's total control of the Senate.