Washington Post- as usual- on the crumbling edge of journalism

Discussion in 'Politics' started by TreeFrogTrader, Dec 19, 2018.

  1. Heh, Washington Post just reported Dec. 14:

    America’s hidden
    war in Syria

    U.S. troops will now stay in Syria
    indefinitely, controlling a third of the
    country and facing peril on many fronts.
    =======================================


    Meanwhile, I see several headline reports that troops are being withdrawn almost immediately.

    Have to read up later after market hours, but in the meantime,

    WHICH ONE SHOULD I BELIEVE?????????
     
    traderob likes this.
  2. I think you can be fairly confident in the sports scores in the Post, provided you can find them amid the articles by SJW sports "journalists" decrying the Redskins name.

    Otherwise, I'd stick to something reliable like Breitbart.
     
    traderob likes this.

  3. I hear ya.

    And the Braves.

    I dunno. A name like that radiates toxic masculinity. Just a matter of time. Although it might radiate native american toxic masculinity, thus being net positive.

    It's complicated.
     
  4. Trump's sudden about-face didn't just leave journalists flatfooted. His own DOD and much of his administration, as well as America's allies, are all "WTF?!"

    Which says a lot more about Trump and his butt-licking apologists than it does about The Washington Post. So please go ahead and do tell us more about your "crumbling edge."
     
    Last edited: Dec 20, 2018