. . . In essence — the speech is long, carefully phrased and difficult to summarize — Putin argues that the New World Order the Bush I administration declared as the Soviet Union collapsed was a fundamental misreading of the moment. It is now a 20-odd-year failure hacks such as Tom Friedman compulsively term the successful spread of neoliberalism in the face of abundant evidence otherwise. “A unilateral diktat and imposing one’s own models produces the opposite result,” Putin asserted. “Instead of settling conflicts it leads to their escalation, instead of sovereign and stable states we see the growing spread of chaos, and instead of democracy there is support for a very dubious public ranging from open neo-fascists to Islamic radicals.” Such is Putin’s take on how we got here. His view of where we have to go now is yet more compelling. Our systems of global security are more or less destroyed — “weakened, fragmented, and deformed,” in Putin’s words. In the face of this reality, multipolar cooperation in the service of substantial reconstruction agreements, in which the interests of all sides are honored, is mandatory. more . . .
World history is an endless series of smaller states or ethnic groups being rolled up into larger countries then eventually breaking apart again. We are seeing the break up phase now in the middle east and Ukraine. Putin's point in part may be that we contributed to that by foolishly undermining authoritative leaders like Saddam Hussein, Ghaddafi and Mubarak. The neo-con big thinkers vastly underestimated the power of fundamentalist islam and its attraction for people who felt humiliated and disenfranchised. It's kind of like the Tea Party, only with guns.