Trump for Nobel Peace Prize

Discussion in 'Politics' started by kandlekid, Jan 21, 2017.

  1. kandlekid

    kandlekid

    Donald Trump's overtures vis a vis Russia are in a word, remarkable. Back in September, Russia was instructing it's citizens to prepare for nuclear war. Had Clinton been elected, we very well may have gotten it. Trump nearly singlehandedly may have averted war with Russia. Russians love Trump. And what's wrong with that ?
     
    WeToddDid2, Ditch and AAAintheBeltway like this.
  2. Cuddles

    Cuddles

    eh...the Chinese hate him?
     
  3. destriero

    destriero

    Zhirinovsky is terrified of the US; our subs and especially THAAD. Putin wanted Trump for many reasons, not the least of which is instability, but also to bend his ear and try for the removal of our THAAD system.

    ANY START talks will be absolutely predicate on our REMOVAL OF THAAD in Europe. Putin will not even schedule talks without THAAD on the chopping block.

    You clowns should really stick to MAGA shit and leave the strategic stuff for the grown-ups.
     
    Last edited: Jan 23, 2017
    Cuddles and big mac like this.
  4. fan27

    fan27

    Are these "strategists" and "grown-ups" the same idiots that suggest arming the Ukrainians? Or better yet, the crew that wanted to find "moderate" Islamic rebels and arm them with billions of dollars worth of US military hardware?
     
    Arnie, traderob, WeToddDid2 and 3 others like this.
  5. destriero

    destriero


    Yup, Portman, Kasich, etc. You really should stop listening to Alex Jones or whatever. Dump truck.
     
  6. destriero

    destriero

    Sure, but China has no delivery vehicles. They are not even on the US radar.
     
  7. achilles28

    achilles28

    dem evil Rooskies
     
  8. destriero

    destriero


    They are the one legit geopolitical threat. The only one with ability to hit us with ICBMs. They have MIRVs and we have THAAD.

    We also have the new hyper-accurate tactical nukes. Reducing CEP/increasing accuracy by 5x is roughly equivalent to a five fold increase in potential.
     
  9. vanzandt

    vanzandt

    Sooo, ....there are no other geopolitical threats? (unless someone can hit us with an ICBM)
    That has to be one of the stupidest things ever written down here.

    Dude....I think you do Google searches for items related to a subject and then drop their names to make yourself sound intelligent.

    Example: " Reducing CEP/increasing accuracy by 5x is roughly equivalent to a five fold increase in potential".

    Who is that written for? Who are you trying to impress? Its like the other day you were talking all cool and real swag about ski resorts. For what reason? And then we had to listen to your BS stories about how you did this and how you did that. Not to mention your arsenals and your MMA skills. And then there's your tales of how you hacked into this and that.

    Not impressed bro. Not impressed. You're just a name dropping pretender. https://www.penomet.com/lp4/
     
    traderob likes this.
  10. JamesL

    JamesL

    #10     Jan 24, 2017