Lefty media is having a meltdown about Trump asking the Australian government to help Barr with the investigation of the origins of the witch hunt. Ahhh, excuse, but there is no problem with that unless you dont want the origins to be uncovered. The Australians were fact involved in the origins although I dont think they did anything wrong. Just as with some of the Americans they just got caught talking with and passing information along that the swamp had planted or set them up to hear from bogus people. Muellers people went to the Ukraine, Great Britain, Italy and all sorts of places to do their investigations. Why can Barr not do that and talk to the people involved as well? Thank you Mr. Barr and Mr. Durham for getting caught doing your job.
The rules are different, depending on if you're investigation a republican crook or a well-meaning democrat who didn't intend to violate the espionage laws.
Maybe, maybe not. Since you already made your mind up, perhaps you can tell us all what Trump asked of the Australian Prime Minister.
I was just responding to what CNN was responding to- their allegation that Trump had asked the Australian prime minister to help Barr with his investigation of the origins of the witch hunt. If Trump did not do that and CNN is reporting fake news, then I dont know. I was not in on the conversation and if you are suggesting that CNN may have just pulled that out of their arse as they often do, then I will give you that.
No, that is not what asking. I do have an interest in Trump tasking the DOJ with investigation’s related to himself then reaching out to foreign countries gain cooperation. There was a time when DOJ maintained a degree of independence from the White House but that is gone now that we are under a tyranny. It’s how republics are lost.
But you see no problem with the fact that Obama and Loretta and Comey did not see the need to appoint an independent counsel for the Hillary's alleged crimes- as though they were somehow free of any bias in their decisionmaking. Hillary was running for president and was under investigation. Right before Comey makes his announcement, Hillary publicly states that if she is elected she is considering re-appointing Loretta. You think Loretta had "independence" in her capacity as an appointee of the Obama White House. Oh sure, you will come out and object now. But not then. Note that I did not even bring the word "tarmac" into the discussion, although it was tempting. Meanwhile, we need to find and out that SwampSpy to advance some of these stories.
Hillary Clinton’s allegations never met a prima facie threshold because the argument was Hillary Clinton violates an espionage law in a way no one ever was convicted of. It was always a garbage allegation. As far a Lynch and Clinton I’m not sure that is a good comparison to Trump and Barr. You’re welcome to try again.
You talk about the Clinton investigation as though it is over just because Comey "exonerated" her. It isn't. And neither is the investigation of the Clinton Foundation. As with a lot of other swamp scenarios, I am not saying that she will be charged with anything but it will expose more and more aspects of the swamp. Just as with the FBI investigation. There will be few charges- if any- but everyone sees that the central office was corrupt. Similarly, Clapperville, Riceville, Lorettaville, and Brennanville will be exposed for the corrupt swampsters that they are. Comeyville has already been exposed, but still more to come.
No, you simply lacked sufficient intelligence to understand the point that I made. You said: "There was a time when DOJ maintained a degree of independence from the White House but that is gone now." I invited you to ask yourself whether there was really a degree of independence from the White House and the DOJ when Loretta was AG. You think Loretta was not up to her eyeballs involved in protecting Hillary? And do you think the White House was really not involved and meddling when Lisa texted to Strzok that he needed to remember that Obama said he wanted to "be kept informed of everything." Fail on your part. Very sleep on your part to not be able to grasp the point.
Right. This has been the MO on practically every investigation against Clinton, it is a Trumped up charge that has no basis and no chance of leading to an indictment but the negative press and political talkingnpoints is invaluable. Complete abuse of the justice system and shame on you for endorsing it.