I was busy last night and did not watch any T.V. This morning I wanted to get a feel for the victory. I wanted to see some post game celebrations here or Breitbart or Drudge. Not much to read. I feel like the reaction for Cruz's and Hillary's wins was far more enthusiastic. So... let me start it here. 1. Although I would vote for Cruz over Trump for President. I think I would vote for Trump as the Nominee vs Hillary or Bernie because I know he will crush both of them. So this win above his polling average was great news. 2. I am also damn happy to see democrats are so pissed at the establishment they would vote for anyone over Hillary. 3. So for the first time in years the U.S. may have a brighter future. It seems the whole country is aware of the fact we have to get the establishment traitors out of office. Now if we can do that, we can get America back to where it should be.
ahh... this is more of what I was expecting... I guess it took a bit of time for the writers to get to print. http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...lt-a-juggernaut-and-had-the-media-pay-for-it/ Why does the mainstream media heap such scorn and disbelief on Donald Trump over his promise to build a great wall along the border with Mexico — and make Mexico pay for it? After all, Donald Trump has built a winning presidential campaign — and made the media pay for it. Mr. Trump’s second place finish in Iowa gave respite to the legions of media pundits and establishment flunkies who suffer the worst forms of Donald Trump Derangement Syndrome. They braced for a huge blow-out win in the Corn State. When it didn’t happen, it was like an executioner’s gun jamming. First they flinched, then they blinked a few times and then got up and ran like their hair was on fire. Ever since, of course, they have been gloating and crowing — from a safe distance — that Donald Trump failed. King Midas had finally touched something and turned it into silver, instead of gold. This, to be sure, is every bit as delusional as the derangement syndrome that has captivated their sanity for six months now. What Donald Trump pulled off in Iowa was nothing short of miraculous. The last time a secular, loud, brash New Yorker who was leading in all the national polls faced Iowa Republican voters — former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani in 2008 — he got truly schlonged. Mr. Giuliani came in sixth place with only 4 percent of the vote. Donald Trump came in second place with an astonishing 24 percent of the vote. He was just 3.3 percentage points behind Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) 97% of Texas, who won the race by shamelessly pandering to the state’s huge evangelical population, which has determined the outcome of every Republican caucus there since at least 2000. If Rudy Giuliani had done as well in Iowa as Trump did, the media would have declared him the winner and he very likely would rushed through New Hampshire and South Carolina on waves of positive press and his ultimate gambit of winning it all in Florida very likely could have worked. In other words, if Mr. Giuliani had done as well as Mr. Trump did in Iowa, we quite possibly would be referring to him now as former President Giuliani. But the media hatred for Mr. Trump is so unrestrained that even a stellar accomplishment like he had in Iowa was dismissed as a shattering loss. And Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) 79% ’s third place loss behind Mr. Trump was spun endlessly as some kind of huge victory. This propelled the Florida Republican, until his poor performance in last weekend’s robotic performance in the New Hampshire debate. What is so amazing about Mr. Trump’s blowout in the nation’s first primary in the Granite State is not just the 2-to-1 win over the next-nearest competitor, but his performance among every demographic group on every single issue. Among women, middle-aged voters, the elderly, the educated — all people the experts warned would flee from Donald Trump — Mr. Trump managed to win. And he won on every major issue, including the economy, foreign policy and immigration. Perhaps the sweetest thing out of New Hampshire is how the media will be forced to spin the results. They will, of course, try to minimize Mr. Trump’s thumping. Then they will be forced to breathe wind into Ohio Gov. John Kasich’s disappointing — but surprising — second-place finish. The Kasich campaign is hopeless going forward. And so the battle rages on for the so-called “establishment lane” with Jeb Bush, Marco Rubio and even Ted Cruz piled up behind John Kasich’s hopeless campaign.
yes.. http://www.breitbart.com/2016-presi...-gop-feel-betrayed-by-republican-politicians/ Exit polls out of New Hampshire show that a full 50% of GOP voters “feel betrayed by Republican politicians.” Obviously, this is a very good sign for Donald Trump, who only just last year became a politician. http://www.breitbart.com/immigratio...f-three-gopers-want-islamic-migration-paused/ The New Hampshire exit polls shows that two-thirds of GOP primary voters in New Hampshire back Donald Trump’s repeated calls for a temporary pause to Islamic immigration until the federal government can suppress imported jihad.
AAA knows me better then I know myself. Trump is the only credible candidate who will secure the border, end offshoring and destroy ISIS. That's devastating. Not to mention deportation of all the illegals and refugees. Bernie is talking tough on free-trade agreements and offshoring. Ben and Cruz are talking a wall.....5 months after Trump said he'd build one. There's really no other alternative.
Betting markets did second huge turnaround since Iowa caucus, putting Trump back on top by large margin, after Rubio had been on top after Iowa. https://www.predictit.org/Market/1233/Who-will-win-the-2016-Republican-presidential-nomination https://electionbettingodds.com/
Rubio had a setback, but he could claw back. Saw a good interview with him on CNN last night. He's the kind of guy who will look 40 when he's 60, so he has plenty of time left.
the point I made was that I would pick cruz over trump if that were the choice for President... but I think I would pick trump or over cruz to the the Republican nominee.