Trump again endangers national security

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Cuddles, Oct 31, 2018.

  1. Cuddles

    Cuddles

    Obama will impart martial law they said....he will have the military march our streets they said....


    https://www.cnn.com/2018/10/30/politics/trump-troops-border-criticisms/index.html

    Veterans slam Trump for border 'stunt'

    Still, the Pentagon appears ready to move forward with the deployment and military officials said Tuesday that the number of troops is likely to exceed 5,200, a total that will surpass the number of US military personnel currently fighting what remains of ISIS in Iraq and Syria.

    "This is not a national security issue. ... We're seeing women, children and the elderly within this caravan fighting for their lives. We don't need more military there," according to Bishop Garrison, the interim executive director of the Truman National Security Project, a left-leaning organization focused on national security and veterans issues.

    "There are laws, there are regulations about how the military can and should be used," the official said. "As somebody that deployed and said good bye to my wife and kids multiple times, you want to be confident about the mission. Sending military troops to the border to defend against unarmed civilians is just nonsense."

    "This is a craven political stunt by President Trump ahead of the US midterms, and a cynical capitulation by a secretary of defense who has prided himself on improving the readiness, focus and lethality of the US armed forces," Kelly Magsamen, a National Security Council official under both President George W. Bush and President Barack Obama, wrote in Defense One.
    "If Mattis does not believe the migrants are a threat that warrants tasking 5,000 active troops to the border, he should say so and resign," Magsamen wrote.

    Instead, Fischer said, these troops will be tasked with supporting border officials in a way that means "we're going to spend a tremendous amount of money and a tremendous amount of resources to have these troops act as errand runners, act as go-fers, act as camouflage-wearing Uber drivers for [homeland security] and border patrol personnel."

    "This is taking away from mission readiness and this is Donald Trump playing politics with our national security," Fischer said.


    "The big problem that I and many former and active military guys have with this thing is that the Posse Comitatus [law] forbids the army from enforcing domestic laws unless there's no other choice and Trump has lots of choices," McGinnis said.
    The President could use federal law enforcement officers such as the US Marshals, or the Army and National Guard. There's also Immigration and Customs Enforcement, McGinnis notes. "We already have an organization that enforces that civil law. It's called ICE."

    "It's not fair to troops," said Garrison of the Truman National Security Project. "This is going to be very costly and just flat-out wrong," he said, arguing that it doesn't make sense to send the military to handle this humanitarian crisis.
     
    Last edited: Oct 31, 2018
    elitenapper likes this.
  2. Poindexter

    Poindexter

    Thanks Obama!

    mil times - Copy.png
     
    Tom B and Arnie like this.
  3. I wonder how hard it was to find two veterans who are against border control? Days? Weeks? Another Leftist propaganda piece trying to justify bad policy that the against the interests and desires of most Americans for political gains.
     
    smallfil and Clubber Lang like this.
  4. piezoe

    piezoe

    Get a grip. It's a show for his base, an expensive one. Of course there are better ways to handle this situation. In the end he may just lie and say he's called out the troops. Who knows? He's an asshole, a jerk, a pathological liar, a con artist, a criminal and a sick narcissist.
     
  5. I see Trump as the potential saviour of Democracy in the US. A least for a little while. I am willing to accept a few warts in exchange for winning on the important issues such as the economy and maintaining our constitutional rights in the US.
     
  6. piezoe

    piezoe

    !!! If you call taking a wrecking ball to the country a "few warts", then your willing to put up with quite a lot, I would say. He's creating chaos in the economy and chaos in the country. He knows nothing about the economy, how to run a business, about government, or about foreign trade and foreign affairs. He's a huge embarrassment. He's a total disaster!
     
    Last edited: Oct 31, 2018
  7. Make that President asshole, a jerk, a pathological liar, a con artist, a criminal and a sick narcissist.
    We can say the same thing, the exact same thing about Hillary. Too bad she got beat at her own game.
     
  8. piezoe

    piezoe

    You should oppose both then!
     
  9. We were only given the twiddle dee, twiddle dum choice, as per usual. Why not roll the dice in those circumstances given how screwed up the country was/is? Hillary was status quo, business as usual political hack. People were tired of that. The repubilcans read the tea leaves correctly, the democrats missed the obvious sea change. Had she, the DNC, and media not colluded to rig the primaries the obvious peoples choice who lean left was Sanders. You guys screwed yourselves by turning a blind eye to the democratic election rigging. The rest is history.
     
  10. Cuddles

    Cuddles

    #10     Oct 31, 2018