You know who you are. The fallacy of perfect solutions, also known as the Nirvana fallacy, is a logical fallacy that occurs when an argument assumes that a perfect solution exists or that a solution should be rejected because some part of the problem would still exist after it were implemented. This is an example of black and white thinking, in which a person fails to see the complex interplay between multiple component elements of a situation or problem, and, as a result, reduces complex problems to a pair of binary extremes. For example, someone might argue that we should not bother trying to reduce carbon emissions because there will always be some emissions. This is a fallacy because it assumes that a perfect solution exists, namely a way to eliminate all carbon emissions. However, such a solution is not possible, and therefore we should not let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Another example of the fallacy of perfect solutions is the argument that we should not bother trying to improve education because there will always be bad teachers. This is also a fallacy because it assumes that a perfect solution exists, namely a way to ensure that all teachers are excellent. However, such a solution is not possible, and therefore we should not let the perfect be the enemy of the good. The fallacy of perfect solutions can be avoided by recognizing that there is no such thing as a perfect solution. All solutions have flaws, and we should strive to find the best solution that is available, even if it is not perfect. Here are some tips for avoiding the fallacy of perfect solutions: Be aware of the tendency to think in black and white terms. Consider the pros and cons of all possible solutions, even if they are not perfect. Be willing to compromise and accept a solution that is not perfect. Remember that the best solution is often the one that is most achievable.
As children grow up, their thinking skills develop in a series of stages. In the early stages, children's thinking is typically black and white, meaning that they see things in absolute terms. They may believe that there is only one right way to do something, or that people are either good or bad. This type of thinking is common in young children because their brains are still developing and they are not yet able to understand the complexities of the world. As children get older, their thinking becomes more sophisticated. They begin to see that there are often multiple perspectives on a problem, and that there is no one right answer. They also become better at understanding the nuances of human behavior. This shift in thinking is gradual and takes place over time. Jean Piaget's cognitive development stages: Sensorimotor stage (birth to 2 years old): In this stage, children learn about the world through their senses. They explore their environment by touching, tasting, smelling, seeing, and hearing. Their thinking is concrete and they do not yet understand abstract concepts. Preoperational stage (2 to 7 years old): In this stage, children begin to develop language and symbolic thought. They can think about things that are not present, but their thinking is still egocentric. This means that they have difficulty seeing things from another person's perspective. Concrete operational stage (7 to 11 years old): In this stage, children's thinking becomes more logical and organized. They can think about abstract concepts and solve problems using logic. However, they may still have difficulty understanding multiple perspectives. Formal operational stage (11 to 16 years old): In this stage, children's thinking becomes fully abstract and they are able to think about hypothetical situations. They can also understand multiple perspectives and consider the consequences of their actions. Now there are other stages, maturity and experience bring. It is not the larger picture. So we try and try and try this with tbe usual suspects: Encourage them to ask questions and explore different perspectives. Help them to see the world from the perspective of others. Provide them with opportunities to solve problems and make decisions. Teach them about abstract concepts and logical reasoning. Be patient and understanding. It takes time for children to develop their thinking skills. Does it have an effect? It it us doing it wrong or are they just stunted?
The last post by @Wallet. One of a small few who was alright except for when he was trying to be contrary. Living in Oklahoma makes it difficult to think differently to society around you. Did he learn and get tired of Covid right wing pandemic talking points and such or did Covid get him? I always had a bit if a worry as he is bigger than me and the initial mild covid hit me hard. I hope he is OK just something got through to him.