The Corona Virus Emergency: A Quantitative View

Discussion in 'Wall St. News' started by dealmaker, Apr 1, 2020.

  1. dealmaker

    dealmaker

  2. Hi Can someone point me towards good research on geological formations and there most common fossil types (such as mammals, reptiles and such)...I will share my research with you folks once ready but I have a theory that volcanic activity (especially in the Pacific Northwest) will create fossils and that will create fuels such as oil? Still sorting through my research but that is the “gist” of it... and haven’t decided yet whether this means oil will go “boom” or “bust” but stay tuned.... thanks -Krent
     
  3. And further more if we have many animals and humans perishing from this carona virus then this will perhaps create more fossils, as one may think? ... Though maybe this is “one step too far up the stool” and will be more likely to be volcano activity fossils creation? Love to hear others thought, thanks... Krent
     
  4. xandman

    xandman

    Not a good time to entertain unconventional thoughts, man. When shit hits the fan, you will only need a small nudge. Stick with the learned heuristics that have seen you through.

    Thinks straight. Make money.
     
  5. Thanks xanderman this Is indeed an interesting perspective (however you folks are not correct)... I have found that my most successful investments are when I “go with my gut” and for this it is clear there is a line to be drawn between volcanic activity and fossil (and hence the fuels, can’t have fuel without fossils?)... most of my research has been focused on where there maybe earthquakes which cause “fissures” in high density mountain ranges (I am now reading an article from American Space and Sky that suggest this) and this will cause volcanoes one might surmise? The next “stool” of my research will be deciding how this will impact oils and prices of oil barrels (My theory is that it will go down? So then I should buy oil more in the future?) But let me know what you folks think I could be wrong (though my research in the past has been “on the mark” so to speak) thanks... Krent
     
  6. noddyboy

    noddyboy