I have not seen anything on TV but see some news on the net. I dont see that the attacker has been identified yet. So, I guess that we just have to guess how many "mohammeds" there are in his name. Could be one, two, or more, as we know. This is not to say that I am ruling out an Abdul or Achmed or either. Then again I could be completely wrong. Could be some Lutheran guy who got into a bad batch of lutefisk and went off the rails. In the meantime, I am going with scenario number one. I guess they killed him so that means he wont be out on bail next week. New York City, I am looking at you.
https://abcnews.go.com/Internationa...t-related-stabbing-incident/story?id=68707033 The assistant commissioner said armed officers who were "part of a proactive counter terrorism operation," were in immediate attendance and shot the unidentified suspect, who was pronounced dead at the scene. Seems like the police knew about this attack well enough in advance they were there with guns ready. We'll never get the whole story on this one. Probably because there are more attacks planned.
Okay, he as been named. Sudesh Amman That's a Norwegian name right? Yup. Another deranged Norwegian who overdosed on the lutefisk and went off the rails. Probably that is why when American TSA sees a family of Norwegians coming through airport security on their way to Disneyland they strip search granny and the kids but just waive the muzzies right through.
Imagine how little injured if they banned Muslims from the country. Majority of all terrorist attacks in the last 10 years were committed by muslims. The few that weren't wouldn't have happened if muslims weren't in the UK. If banning guns works well, then banning muslims should also work, don't you think?
Spree killings are terrorist incidents as well. The goal is to create terror and instability. So banning Muslims in US for example wouldn't help much. Committing a slaughter should be made as difficult as possible, strict gun control is one good method.
Strict gun control IS a good method, unless there are already hundreds of millions of guns in circulation. Then it is worthless.
Australia proved the exact opposite. You think your own police is completely toothless? Guns can be removed from circulation with a little effort. Your attitude of "this is how it is, this is how it'll always be" is odd.