June 18, 2020, 9:04 AM CDT By Pete Williams WASHINGTON — The U.S. Supreme Court ruled Thursday that the Trump administration cannot carry out its plan to shut down the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, which has allowed nearly 800,000 young people, known as "Dreamers," to avoid deportation and remain in the U.S. The decision is a big legal defeat for President Donald Trump on the issue of immigration, which has been a major focus of his domestic agenda. The ruling said the government failed to give an adequate justification for ending the federal program. The administration could try again to shut it down by offering a more detailed explanation for its action, but the White House might not want to end such a popular program in the heat of a presidential campaign. Immigration lawyers told the Supreme Court after the case was argued last fall that frontline health care workers involved in responding to the coronavirus epidemic rely on about 27,000 DACA recipients, "including dentists, pharmacists, physician assistants, home health aides, technicians" and nearly 200 medical students. "Termination of DACA during this national health emergency would be catastrophic," they said in an April 2 court filing. The Association of American Medical Colleges told the court last fall — well before the pandemic crisis — that the U.S. is unprepared "to fill the loss that would result if DACA recipients were excluded from the health care workforce." The court said the Department of Homeland Security did not act properly when it ordered the program ended in 2017. In response to legal challenges, lower court rulings allowed DACA to keep going, letting young people in the program to reapply every two years and remain under its protection. Children of illegal immigrants were allowed to remain here if they were under 16 when their parents brought them to the U.S. and if they arrived by 2007. DACA's defenders had argued that federal law required the Trump administration to give a detailed explanation before trying to shut the program down — an action that would affect hundreds of thousands of people and the businesses that employ them. Instead, they said, the government simply declared the program illegal. More than 100 business groups, including Apple and Microsoft, sought to preserve DACA, arguing many of their employees are part of the program. Figures show that over 90 percent of DACA participants have a job. Nearly half are in school. Many don't speak the language or know the culture of their home countries. Among them is Claudia Quinonez of Maryland, brought to the U.S. at age 11 by her mother, who overstayed a tourist visa. "DACA truly changed my life. I have a Social Security number. I have the ability to work, to contribute, and pay taxes," she said.
#Winning Honestly thought SCOTUS would go scorched earth after the LGBT win (thinking just peace meal) 5-4; such BS
This was another @TreeFrogTrader ”countdown to” DACA ruling. He thought the ruling would go Trump’s way and force congress to legislate on Trump’s immigration terms.
This is an outrage.Defund the Supreme Court. Seems to be the popular solution anytime someone doesn't get their way.
Justice John Roberts has been very liberal for sure. Remember, he kept Obamacare alive. The solution is simple. When Ruth Bader Ginsburg steps down, fill her seat with a conservative judge in the mold of Justice Gorsuch or Justice Kavanaugh. That is one more reason a 2nd term for President Donald Trump is needed. Restore law and order to the US.
“Today’s decision must be recognized for what it is: an effort to avoid a politically controversial but legally correct decision,” Justice Thomas wrote. “The court could have made clear that the solution respondents seek must come from the legislative branch.”
So now executive orders cant be undone by future presidents? Hmm, trump should go to town with that..
So, what you’re missing is that Trump declared DACA illegal as a justification for ending DACA. This is where he ran afoul of the constitution. SCOTUS simply stated the executive branch does not have that power, which it obviously does not. The Trump administration can go through the proper, legal course if they want to.