Soleimani no longer has a carbon footprint

Discussion in 'Politics' started by wildchild, Jan 8, 2020.

  1. wildchild

    wildchild

    His killing has helped the environment and has curbed global warming.
     
  2. Overnight

    Overnight

    Why, because he will no longer fart? lol!

    You have made a silly statement.

    Trump did a good thing on ordering his taking out. However, he needs to stop with the sun-tanning booths. He looked terrible today on camera. You can so easily-see the goggle-shadow on his eyes. It's just stupid.

    Let's see how he now handles China on Feb 15th, if that shit is still even on.
     
  3. wildchild

    wildchild

    You do realize that when humans breathe they exhale CO2. You will no longer be breathing and contributing to global warming. There is absolutely nothing silly about it.

    He will also not be committing terrorism.

    No more terrorism and no more global warming from this guy. I am a glass totally full kind of guy.
     
  4. Overnight

    Overnight

    Then we should plant a tree upon his grave, because the tree will absorb CO2 and provide oxygen for the remaining living people.

    You do realize that trees absorb CO2 and release oxygen?

    You are still being silly.
     
  5. wildchild

    wildchild

    The tree and his death are in no way related. Secondly, the tree is carbon neutral.

    Also his death triggered a stampede which resulted in the death of over 60 of supporters.

    That is how you curb greenhouse gas emissions.

    I have no idea what your silly statement is in reference to.
     
  6. Overnight

    Overnight

    The silliness is the suggestion that a person no longer breathing is reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Yes, they are no longer exhaling CO2. But they also are not reducing greenhouse gasses by using all this supposed carbon-neutral shit like electric cars and avocado toast.

    His successor may be twice the producer of greenhouse gasses by choosing to travel in a Hummer. So maybe he should have been kept alive, so he produces less CO2, because he chose to drive a Toyota.

    (By the way, did you notice the video of his wreckage? It was a Toyota. Maybe it was a Prius. So you killed the guy who was saving the environment.)

    Really, wildchild, where are you going with this? Your whole premise for the thread is just silly!

    I think you need some happy, silly music!

     
  7. wildchild

    wildchild

    If a person is no longer breathing, they are no longer exhaling CO2. There is no debate. It is true.

    He successor exists whether or not he was killed. Before the killing there were two CO2 emitters. After the killing, there is one CO2 emitter. 2-1 = 1. Hopefully soon it will be 1 -1 = 0.

    How is driving a Prius saving in the environment? Explain that logic.

    It is plain and simple. Eliminating this guy will benefit the environment.
     
  8. Overnight

    Overnight

    He's already been eliminated, so where the "will" comes in I do not know.

    In the end, I am bowing out of this silly. You are trying to have fun with it all, I can see that. OK, they guy is dead. And I am bowing out of this thread until it becomes a discussion about pollution or something, and not a "yay, he's dead" thing!
     
  9. wildchild

    wildchild

    It is helping the environment.

    This idea is much deeper than you think. Hardly silly, MAN.
     
  10. vanzandt

    vanzandt

    Someone I know today brought up the possibility that Trump took out Soleimani to make Bolton happy, appease him if you will, just to keep him quiet regarding the matters at hand now. And it certainly is true... Bolton was pretty hawkish on that cat.
    Never know. Interesting theory though.
     
    #10     Jan 27, 2020