Not really sure why. Reason for permanent ban was unspecified. Whatever. All I did was post a link to my blog post that was about two stock tickers, FCEL and VRML, that did really interesting things today, a day after I posted. Not going to try to do things in a forum that can only be accomplished on a web page. Whatever.
FCEL has been skying and wouldn't you know I was long a little over a week ago, just dumped it with a few centz profit for some reason I can't recall. Where is the head bang against wall smiley
hello? do people view this forum? I thought, mayhap, I would get some reason for my banning. like: "HEY, you can't post links to blogs, that is FORBIDDEN"
lol... i write a post about how noone actually is on this forum and of course someone posts before it hits the wire.... well sorry to hear that bro... I would say, that it is a reasonable buy here, (or was, who knows what kind of ridiculous gap up comes in the mornings lol), with a reasonable stop.... as seen on the chart from my blog.
Been long in that company since $1.10 for YEARS in my IRA. About damn time I made some money in it, lol. I'm waiting to see if tomorrow has more upside potential. If not, I'm dumping, and will rebuy with a retracement. They aren't making money yet so I see no reason to rush into another re-buy. But I am optimistic about the future of fuel cells.
It must have been because the stock price is under $5. That is technically a penny stock and they are against the rules to promote or discuss here. The reason is that if they allow that, then it is going to attract all of the stock promoters and turn this outstanding site into a spam message board for penny stocks. As for your blog post, you can even post a anchor text keyword link to it if you want....
okay.. I saw the thing about penny stocks being banned, and I took that to mean, actual penny stocks under $1. So, if thats the reason.. my apologies. If you check out my charts, i'm obviously not "pumping" them.. but rather providing some reasonable expectations on them . . . but thanks for your feedback on why I may have been banned. It's not like I even pumped them outright on this forum ? I provided a link, and if you actually look at the charts in the link, it is far from pumping. Overzealous moderation? P.S. I don't know what an anchor text keyword link is ... lol
A *VERY* reasonable opinion . . . I would suggest looking at my chart? Rather than selling outright, you could set a pretty reasonable and very profitable stop.
Okay, so no penny stocks, meaning <$5 stocks, allowed (why not say no less than $5 stocks allowed then ???) I will do a post soon on EXAS, a great company that has upcoming FDA adcom meeting on March 27th. Soon... next couple days. It has a great technical chart, but i could give a crap about that. I love the fundamentals on it. And the short interest is insane. People are betting heavily against it, because the prior management screwed the pooch so badly, but they havent done their DD on the current management and the current test and the current clinical trial results and competition, IMO. DYODD - and look for a post from me in the next week, on EXAS.
So you own the stock from 1.10, but rather than set a greater than 100% profit stop, you're going to sell outright if it doesnt continue parabolically? Lol okay, I guess it takes all to make a market.