So how many Nuclear Plants could Europe and USA build, by not enriching Pfizer and Moderna?

Discussion in 'Politics' started by DT-waw, Sep 11, 2022.

  1. DT-waw

    DT-waw

    Just 2 years and Both regions could build enough nuclear plants to derive 100% of energy needs from nuclear. Prove me wrong ;)

    But nooo. Dear Satan, no.
    THis would mean, nobody would need mortgages and loans to finance their luxury living!
    As energy would be cheap as Hunters hookers ;)
    And this leads to banking cartel demise.
     
  2. Ricter

    Ricter

    Getting "100% of energy needs from nuclear" is a myth.
     
    Tony Stark likes this.
  3. notagain

    notagain

    USA under new leadership could crush energy prices with or without nuclear.
    Climate changing China and India burn coal and should have switched to nuclear long ago.
     
  4. Cuddles

    Cuddles

    except solar is nuclear which basically is responsible for every energy need we've ever used (including hydrocarbons). The only exception here is geothermal and tidal.
     
  5. Ricter

    Ricter

    I agree, but a scenario where we get 100% of our energy from solar would mean a lifestyle radically different from the one we have now, which is massively inflated by the input of fossil solar (call it fossil nuclear if you like :D).
     
  6. Ricter

    Ricter

    This, not you, falls under Materials Blindness
     
  7. Overnight

    Overnight

    Yeah, it's Dyson Sphere-level stuff that is physically impossible in this universe.

     
    Ricter likes this.