SEC: Citigroup Provided Incomplete Blue Sheet Data for 15 Years FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE 2016-138 Washington D.C., July 12, 2016 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Citigroup Global Markets has agreed to pay a $7 million penalty and admit wrongdoing to settle charges that a computer coding error caused the firm to provide the agency with incomplete “blue sheet” information about trades it executed. According to the SEC’s order instituting a settled administrative proceeding, the coding error occurred in the software that Citigroup used from May 1999 to April 2014 to process SEC requests for blue sheet data, including the time of trades, types of trades, volume traded, prices, and other customer identifying information. During that 15-year period, Citigroup consequently omitted 26,810 securities transactions from its responses to more than 2,300 blue sheet requests. After discovering the coding error, Citigroup failed to report the incident to the SEC or take any steps to produce the omitted data until nine months later. “Broker-dealers have a core responsibility to promptly provide the SEC with accurate and complete trading data for us to analyze during enforcement investigations,” said Robert A. Cohen, Co-Chief of the SEC Enforcement Division’s Market Abuse Unit. “Citigroup did not live up to that responsibility for an inexcusably long period of time, and it must pay the largest penalty to date for blue sheet violations.” The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Martin Zerwitz, Michael C. Baker, and Deborah A. Tarasevich of the Market Abuse Unit, and the case was supervised by Mr. Cohen. Other SEC cases involving failures to provide complete blue sheet data: Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC paid a $4.25 million penalty in September 2015, admitting that technological and human errors resulted in the omission of more than 553,400 reportable trades from blue sheet responses to the SEC for more than two years. OZ Management LP paid a $4.25 million penalty in July 2015, admitting that it provided inaccurate trade data to four of its prime brokers and caused blue sheet violations for nearly six years. Scottrade paid a $2.5 million penalty in January 2014, admitting that a computer coding error resulted in the omission of trades from blue sheet responses to the SEC for more than six years.
It seems like if you're a business which must make reports to the government, it's damned if you do, and damned if you don't . Cause you know they're going to find something, real or not. What is the cost of noncompliance in that situation?
There's still a perception that all these greedy traders and brokers are ripping everyone off. For that you can thank the administration of Barry Obamy. Meanwhile there's consolidation in this industry everywhere.
I agree with this, and have seen it. Big C tends to hire 10 imported incompetents, rather than 2 local rock stars. Stupid policy .. so the desk builds adhoc stuff itself, to work around tech that doesn't work.