There used to be a time when the average person on the street was asked about Futures at the CME, and every average Joe thought it was rigged. With the advent of electronic trading, all the tricks played in the pits are gone. Futures, through democratization and stringent controls for fair play for all CME customers, has become the premier trading venue. Securities are one scam after the other with insider trading scandals gallore. The powers that be in NY want to make it more and more controlled and strangle competition and fair play. The solution is the same: Democratize Securities trading by making it more accessible to all. IMO, it is sad that Single Stock Futures (SSFs) never took off and gave equities trading in NY a real competitor. SEC alleges Cooperman used insider information about an asset sale to generate illegal profits, sought to cover tracks. Jon Marino | @JonMarino Billionaire Leon Cooperman and his Omega Advisors hedge fund were charged Wednesday with insider trading, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced. The SEC accused Cooperman of buying into Atlas Pipeline Partners ahead of a deal, using his status as one of its largest shareholders to acquire nonpublic information about an upcoming transaction. "We allege that hedge fund manager Cooperman, who as a large APL shareholder obtained access to confidential corporate information, abused that access by trading on this information," said Andrew J. Ceresney, director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement. "By doing so, he allegedly undermined the public confidence in the securities markets and took advantage of other investors who did not have this information." According to the complaint filed by the SEC, 73-year-old Cooperman generated illegal profits in 2010 after an unnamed Atlas Pipeline Partners executive provided him confidential information. When Atlas struck a deal to sell its Elk City, Oklahoma, operating facilities, its shares' value increased by more than 30 percent. Scott Eelis | Bloomberg | Getty Images Leon Cooperman, chairman and chief executive officer of Omega Advisors LLC. The SEC states in its complaint that Cooperman called Atlas a "sh---y business" in 2010. However, after a conversation with the unnamed company executive where he learned about the expected M&A deal, he in July 2010 began buying more securities. He allegedly told the company executive with whom he spoke about the Atlas M&A deal that he would not use confidential information to trade, according to the SEC, but "did not abide by his agreement to maintain in confidence, and not trade on the basis of, the Eli City sale information," the complaint states. After investigators subpoenaed Omega and Cooperman, the complaint says, he contacted the unnamed executive and "attempted to fabricate a story in case" they were both questioned about the trades. Further, the complaint states, Cooperman violated securities laws by failing to report information about holdings he owned in a timely manner. The SEC's complaint says an unnamed family member of Cooperman's spoke with a colleague about the trade after the Elk City deal was announced. When the colleague of Cooperman's family member said that trades in Atlas stock were "fishy," the unnamed family member responded "Somebody should investigate that," according to the SEC complaint. Cooperman and Omega Advisors say they plan to fight the charges, which in a statement to CNBC he called "without merit." Further, Cooperman said the SEC sought a settlement with him and his fund which he called "unacceptable."... http://www.cnbc.com/2016/09/21/sec-...rman-omega-advisers-with-insider-trading.html
it is about government money extortion, empire building and bragging rights, how they humbled a big hedge fund manager.
So you believe he's innocent then and a GS-14 somewhere fabricated the whole thing for "bragging rights"? On what basis exactly?
the fact that cooperman refused to accept a carefully worded financial penalty infers that the gov't is out for blood.
It was up to him to accept or not. The settlement the SEC offers is based on what they perceive the strength of their case to be. If they perceive that they have a strong case, they offer him what he would perceive to be a poor deal so he would be more likely to opt to take it to trial. Less to lose and more to gain. If they had a poor case they would probably have offered him a better deal and he would have more incentive to take it to avoid the negatives and risk of a trial. So the fact that they offered him a settlement he didn't take points to the government having what they perceive to be a strong case, not to them being "out for blood", "extorting", "empire building", looking for "bragging rights", or any other hyperbole. I get the impression that you find fault with SEC enforcement staff doing what they're paid to do. I'm guessing you'd call them lazy government workers if they didn't do what they were paid to do (I would). So what exactly is it you want? Is it possible that you've misplaced your anger at the laws, passed by congress and signed by the President, onto the people who are doing their job enforcing those laws?
Good article that explains what is going on https://www.bloomberg.com/view/arti...an-thought-another-s-trades-were-pretty-fishy Sounds like this suit will go nowhere
Feds cant prove he said he wasn't going to act on the info he was given. They are just witch hunting like on the Cuban trial
This article seems to be saying that if you're a big enough shareholder to get inside info on a company, then there's no problem if you trade on that insider info. That no mere mortals have because they're not rich enough. The insider trading laws may be written that way, if so it seems pretty messed up!
the courts have recently defined insider trader more narrowly. SEC lost and wrecked some ongoing cases. . it is money and ego with these people.
the market is already rigged by the fed...why the hell is insider trading illegal? how else would hedge funds beat the s&p!?