https://www.project2025.org/about/about-project-2025/ The actions of liberal politicians in Washington have created a desperate need and unique opportunity for conservatives to start undoing the damage the Left has wrought and build a better country for all Americans in 2025. It is not enough for conservatives to win elections. If we are going to rescue the country from the grip of the radical Left, we need both a governing agenda and the right people in place, ready to carry this agenda out on day one of the next conservative administration. This is the goal of the 2025 Presidential Transition Project. The project will build on four pillars that will, collectively, pave the way for an effective conservative administration: a policy agenda, personnel, training, and a 180-day playbook. The project is the effort of a broad coalition of conservative organizations that have come together to ensure a successful administration begins in January 2025. With the right conservative policy recommendations and properly vetted and trained personnel to implement them, we will take back our government.
I recommend visiting the Project 2025 site and read their content. However, I will post each of their well researched and cited articles here for review and comment, for those so inclined.
The 2025 Presidential Transition Project is being organized by The Heritage Foundation and builds off Heritage’s longstanding “Mandate for Leadership,” which has been highly influential for presidential administrations since the Reagan era. Most recently, the Trump administration relied heavily on Heritage’s “Mandate” for policy guidance, embracing nearly two-thirds of Heritage’s proposals within just one year in office. Paul Dans, former chief of staff at the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) during the Trump administration, serves as the director of the 2025 Presidential Transition Project. Spencer Chretien, former special assistant to the president and associate director of Presidential Personnel, serves as associate director of the project. Project 2025 Team Paul Dans Director, Project 2025 The Heritage Foundation Spencer Chretien Associate Director, Project 2025 The Heritage Foundation
Horrible for America.All blame goes to Joe Biden,a Democrat president so bad millions of progressives,blacks,college issue voters,climate voters and hispanics are willing to endure 4 more years of Trump rather than vote for that piece of shit snake Joe Biden again.
It has to be impossible for a political candidate to satisfy all their voters or even any one voter completely. There are too many competing interests, even within the core of a political leader's party. If you were willing to accept substantial, but not necessarily complete representation, what tradeoffs would you consider?
Obama was far from what I and many progs, blacks and hispanics wanted but did enough to get enough of our votes a 2nd time.
I was hoping for more specific information. I'll ask myself the same question I asked you after a short preamble. It seems many seriously believe the other side is looking destroy the values they hold dear. While there may be indications that elitists in various forms are seriously bent, their perspectives do not reflect what most people want, they still try to influence the system that affects us all. However, by in large, reality is most people want to get along and accept each other's differences. In broad strokes, it seems to me the leadership on the Left is currently more about gaining power than anything else. Everything is seemingly looked first through the lens of whether it helps them politically, rather than objectively asking if it helps the country or fulfills their obligations to represent the people. The Democrat Party seems built upon the idea that power should flow from the exceptional few to the many. However, Democrats are associated with Social Libertarianism in support of maintaining personal freedoms and choice. The Republican Party was build on the idea the many, each free to pursue their own interests, is wiser as a whole, than Government bureaucrats micromanaging. That power flows from the people to elected Representatives, where people are the sovereign, not the Government. The Right also has a substantial number of fundamentalist religious practitioners who have their own ideas in regards to personal freedoms, sometimes creating dissension. Republicans historically have been fiscally and especially socially Conservative. My political belief system is based upon discovering and utilizing principles to guide me. An example of such a principle is related to economic systems. Capitalism works when people acting productively in their own self interest benefits society. Socialism works when resources must be rationed, such as wartime conditions. My support of a candidate is often based on how well their platform addresses the needs of society, whether it is economic, social, geopolitical, and or legal protections. My relative weighting of these general considerations can change over time, depending upon the environment we are currently in. No one politician or political party can deliver all or even most of what I consider important. There are always tradeoffs to consider. For me, Trump is a better choice than Biden because Trump has a better grasp of the fundamental principles regarding economics and the importance of national identity than Biden. I am impressed with how well Trump can handle media abuse, suggesting a certain durability in a potential extended national crisis, should one happen. However, Trump's personality makes it hard for extraordinary people to work for him and can needlessly harm important international relationships. However, Project 25 appears to address many of my concerns and has caused me to become excited about our prospects as a country again.